Rach 2 transcription
-
@Horace said in Rach 2 transcription:
some of her WTC fugues
This is ... interesting.
Link to videoShe makes the first prelude almost Debussy-like.
She makes the first prelude almost Debussy-like.
And I thought Khatia Buniatishvili could at times be a bit too idiosyncratic!
I was expecting Lim to transition into Liszt’s Leibenstraum rather than the fugue.
Please tell me she wasn’t playing Bach.
-
She makes the first prelude almost Debussy-like.
And I thought Khatia Buniatishvili could at times be a bit too idiosyncratic!
I was expecting Lim to transition into Liszt’s Leibenstraum rather than the fugue.
Please tell me she wasn’t playing Bach.
@Renauda said in Rach 2 transcription:
I thought Khatia Buniatishvili could at times be a bit too idiosyncratic!
She makes Gould look sane.
And although she can play fast, in her
transcriptionbutchering of the Rachmaninoff, I could swear I heard a lot of slop. -
I like Gould’s Bach and love his Hindemith Sonatas.
Overall I enjoy Buniatishvili; her Liszt Sonata is among my favourites.
But this? It’s awful.
@Renauda said in Rach 2 transcription:
I like Gould’s Bach
Oh, don't get me wrong! I enjoy it as well. He's faithful, musical, but yeah, still, at times idiosyncratic. Listen to his Mozart K.331!
He pushed the envelope without setting it on fire.
If you've had enough whiskey, give her Beethoven a listen.
-
Thanks, but I’ll stay with Buchbinder’s Beethoven.
But with Gould, I like his Bach and his recordings of 20th C composers. Never heard his Mozart and his recordings of Romantics that I have heard left me cold. Couldn’t stand his recording of Scriabin’s 3rd Sonata. But as noted above his Hindemith is superb - “Gould really gets it” as a now deceased close friend used to say when he heard a recording or pianist he really liked.
-
Thanks, but I’ll stay with Buchbinder’s Beethoven.
But with Gould, I like his Bach and his recordings of 20th C composers. Never heard his Mozart and his recordings of Romantics that I have heard left me cold. Couldn’t stand his recording of Scriabin’s 3rd Sonata. But as noted above his Hindemith is superb - “Gould really gets it” as a now deceased close friend used to say when he heard a recording or pianist he really liked.
-
About the Rach 2, the original has explored the modern piano solo and the modern symphonic orchestra so fully that it's hard to "reduce" it to a lesser configuration.
Is it "worth doing"? Worth it to whom, compared to what?
She did it, she seems happy about it, and enough people buy tickets to go hear it live. I suppose that passes some criteria for "worth it." The critics can go to heck.
-
I agree, in the big scheme of things it doesn’t matter whether it was or was not done. As Jon pointed out there are other transcriptions that he says sound better. Regardless, the time and effort must have been worth it to her.
Will just have to see how her transcription stands up to the test of time.