Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Hannity Offers

Hannity Offers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
84 Posts 13 Posters 1.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RenaudaR Offline
    RenaudaR Offline
    Renauda
    wrote on last edited by Renauda
    #65

    The question isn't a referendum on whether Tucker could be more to anybody's taste, it's whether Tucker, for all his faults, served a useful purpose here to someone other than Putin and himself.

    Must have been to Carlson, himself. His lack of preparedness and any apparent interview skill certainly didn’t serve any useful purpose to enhance the reputation of American journalism.

    Elbows up!

    1 Reply Last reply
    • Doctor PhibesD Online
      Doctor PhibesD Online
      Doctor Phibes
      wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
      #66

      Remember the famous Walter Cronkite interview of Adolf Hitler?

      The Tucker thing wouldn't have been quite as bad if he hadn't spent the previous months questioning why we were so pro Ukraine. I seem to think he once described Putin as a defender of traditional Christian values.

      Presumably, by 'traditional Christian values' he wasn't referring to crucifixion.

      I was only joking

      George KG RenaudaR 2 Replies Last reply
      • kluursK Offline
        kluursK Offline
        kluurs
        wrote on last edited by
        #67

        Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

        Many people are dancing around the benefits of Carlson's interview. He is encouraging Americans to re-examine their personal and tribal foundational beliefs and principles. Tucker's nascent appreciation of the benefits of Socialism may lead Americans to question their fear of Socialism - something heretofore repudiated and vilified by the right.

        HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
        • kluursK kluurs

          Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

          Many people are dancing around the benefits of Carlson's interview. He is encouraging Americans to re-examine their personal and tribal foundational beliefs and principles. Tucker's nascent appreciation of the benefits of Socialism may lead Americans to question their fear of Socialism - something heretofore repudiated and vilified by the right.

          HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote on last edited by
          #68

          @kluurs said in Hannity Offers:

          Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

          Many people are dancing around the benefits of Carlson's interview. He is encouraging Americans to re-examine their personal and tribal foundational beliefs and principles. Tucker's nascent appreciation of the benefits of Socialism may lead Americans to question their fear of Socialism - something heretofore repudiated and vilified by the right.

          I think it would be difficult to trace back any of Tucker's appreciation for certain details of Russia to socialism. Authoritarianism maybe.

          Education is extremely important.

          RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
          • HoraceH Horace

            There is a fact that Putin talked to him in an unscripted long form interview. No other journalist was given that opportunity. Of course you can see it as Tucker being just the sort of useful idiot that Putin would talk to, but I don't buy that the world is a worse place because the interview occurred, or because Tucker spewed some nonsense while in Russia. The question isn't a referendum on whether Tucker could be more to anybody's taste, it's whether Tucker, for all his faults, served a useful purpose here to someone other than Putin and himself. Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

            JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #69

            @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

            There is a fact that Putin talked to him in an unscripted long form interview. No other journalist was given that opportunity. Of course you can see it as Tucker being just the sort of useful idiot that Putin would talk to, but I don't buy that the world is a worse place because the interview occurred, or because Tucker spewed some nonsense while in Russia. The question isn't a referendum on whether Tucker could be more to anybody's taste, it's whether Tucker, for all his faults, served a useful purpose here to someone other than Putin and himself. Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

            How is it you can see this most salient of points, but our Northern neighbor has totally overlooked it?

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

              Remember the famous Walter Cronkite interview of Adolf Hitler?

              The Tucker thing wouldn't have been quite as bad if he hadn't spent the previous months questioning why we were so pro Ukraine. I seem to think he once described Putin as a defender of traditional Christian values.

              Presumably, by 'traditional Christian values' he wasn't referring to crucifixion.

              George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #70

              @Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:

              Remember the famous Walter Cronkite interview of Adolf Hitler?

              No, but I remember the famous Peter Arnett interview of bin Laden.

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote on last edited by
                #71

                If Hitler had reached out for an interview, would Cronkite have said no?

                Education is extremely important.

                Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                  There is a fact that Putin talked to him in an unscripted long form interview. No other journalist was given that opportunity. Of course you can see it as Tucker being just the sort of useful idiot that Putin would talk to, but I don't buy that the world is a worse place because the interview occurred, or because Tucker spewed some nonsense while in Russia. The question isn't a referendum on whether Tucker could be more to anybody's taste, it's whether Tucker, for all his faults, served a useful purpose here to someone other than Putin and himself. Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

                  How is it you can see this most salient of points, but our Northern neighbor has totally overlooked it?

                  RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #72

                  @Jolly said in Hannity Offers:

                  @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                  There is a fact that Putin talked to him in an unscripted long form interview. No other journalist was given that opportunity. Of course you can see it as Tucker being just the sort of useful idiot that Putin would talk to, but I don't buy that the world is a worse place because the interview occurred, or because Tucker spewed some nonsense while in Russia. The question isn't a referendum on whether Tucker could be more to anybody's taste, it's whether Tucker, for all his faults, served a useful purpose here to someone other than Putin and himself. Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

                  How is it you can see this most salient of points, but our Northern neighbor has totally overlooked it?

                  Not overlooked it, but rather disregarded it.

                  Why? Because it’s what you, the apologist, want to believe about the interview. That and the fact that like your apologetics for Carlson, it is of little if any consequence.

                  Elbows up!

                  JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Horace

                    @kluurs said in Hannity Offers:

                    Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

                    Many people are dancing around the benefits of Carlson's interview. He is encouraging Americans to re-examine their personal and tribal foundational beliefs and principles. Tucker's nascent appreciation of the benefits of Socialism may lead Americans to question their fear of Socialism - something heretofore repudiated and vilified by the right.

                    I think it would be difficult to trace back any of Tucker's appreciation for certain details of Russia to socialism. Authoritarianism maybe.

                    RenaudaR Offline
                    RenaudaR Offline
                    Renauda
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #73

                    @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                    @kluurs said in Hannity Offers:

                    Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

                    Many people are dancing around the benefits of Carlson's interview. He is encouraging Americans to re-examine their personal and tribal foundational beliefs and principles. Tucker's nascent appreciation of the benefits of Socialism may lead Americans to question their fear of Socialism - something heretofore repudiated and vilified by the right.

                    I think it would be difficult to trace back any of Tucker's appreciation for certain details of Russia to socialism. Authoritarianism Stalinism maybe.

                    He loved the Stalin era architecture of the downtown Metro stations. I bet too he was awe struck by the towering wedding cake skyscrapers Stalin bequeathed the city.

                    Elbows up!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • HoraceH Horace

                      If Hitler had reached out for an interview, would Cronkite have said no?

                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                      #74

                      @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                      If Hitler had reached out for an interview, would Cronkite have said no?

                      The question you should ask is whether Cronkite would have asked him tough questions, or whether, like Carlson, he'd allow him to ramble on for the most part unchallenged.

                      Obviously, Carlson isn't really a journalist any more than is Jon Stewart.

                      I was only joking

                      HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                      • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                        @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                        If Hitler had reached out for an interview, would Cronkite have said no?

                        The question you should ask is whether Cronkite would have asked him tough questions, or whether, like Carlson, he'd allow him to ramble on for the most part unchallenged.

                        Obviously, Carlson isn't really a journalist any more than is Jon Stewart.

                        HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #75

                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:

                        @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                        If Hitler had reached out for an interview, would Cronkite have said no?

                        The question you should ask is whether Cronkite would have asked him tough questions, or whether, like Carlson, he'd allow him to ramble on for the most part unchallenged.

                        Obviously, Carlson isn't really a journalist any more than is Jon Stewart.

                        I am sure you will get the sort of questioning you are after when he is prosecuted for war crimes, and he is on the stand. Failing that, I don't think many of us subscribe to any journalist-as-hero narratives.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                        • HoraceH Horace

                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:

                          @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                          If Hitler had reached out for an interview, would Cronkite have said no?

                          The question you should ask is whether Cronkite would have asked him tough questions, or whether, like Carlson, he'd allow him to ramble on for the most part unchallenged.

                          Obviously, Carlson isn't really a journalist any more than is Jon Stewart.

                          I am sure you will get the sort of questioning you are after when he is prosecuted for war crimes, and he is on the stand. Failing that, I don't think many of us subscribe to any journalist-as-hero narratives.

                          RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote on last edited by Renauda
                          #76

                          @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:

                          @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                          If Hitler had reached out for an interview, would Cronkite have said no?

                          The question you should ask is whether Cronkite would have asked him tough questions, or whether, like Carlson, he'd allow him to ramble on for the most part unchallenged.

                          Obviously, Carlson isn't really a journalist any more than is Jon Stewart.

                          I am sure you will get the sort of questioning you are after when he is prosecuted for war crimes, and he is on the stand. Failing that, I don't think many of us subscribe to any journalist-as-hero narratives.

                          Chances are Putin will never stand trial for his war crimes. To expect otherwise is wishful thinking.

                          As for anyone here subscribing to journalist-as-hero narratives, I should think you know better. Phibes is not suggesting that and nor am I. What we are stating is that Carlson didn’t do his job when the opportunity was presented to him on a silver platter. I attribute his failure to negligence stemming from a lack of competence as a journalist. Nothing more.

                          Elbows up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • CopperC Offline
                            CopperC Offline
                            Copper
                            wrote on last edited by Copper
                            #77

                            I saw Hitler

                            Thompson's most significant work abroad took place in Germany in the early 1930s.[2] In Munich, Thompson met and interviewed Adolf Hitler for the first time in 1931. This would be the basis for her subsequent book, I Saw Hitler, in which she wrote about the dangers of him winning power in Germany.[1] Later, in a Harper's Magazine article in December 1934, Thompson described Hitler in the following terms: "He is formless, almost faceless, a man whose countenance is a caricature, a man whose framework seems cartilaginous, without bones. He is inconsequent and voluble, ill poised and insecure. He is the very prototype of the little man."

                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Thompson

                            https://fee.org/articles/meet-the-first-american-journalist-to-interview-hitler-and-the-first-expelled-from-nazi-germany/

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                              Remember the famous Walter Cronkite interview of Adolf Hitler?

                              The Tucker thing wouldn't have been quite as bad if he hadn't spent the previous months questioning why we were so pro Ukraine. I seem to think he once described Putin as a defender of traditional Christian values.

                              Presumably, by 'traditional Christian values' he wasn't referring to crucifixion.

                              RenaudaR Offline
                              RenaudaR Offline
                              Renauda
                              wrote on last edited by Renauda
                              #78

                              @Doctor-Phibes

                              I seem to think he once described Putin as a defender of traditional Christian values.

                              Yes, once when Carlson was recently in Hungary and pretty sure on at least one or two other occasions; clips may even have been posted here.

                              Elbows up!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • RenaudaR Renauda

                                @Jolly said in Hannity Offers:

                                @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                                There is a fact that Putin talked to him in an unscripted long form interview. No other journalist was given that opportunity. Of course you can see it as Tucker being just the sort of useful idiot that Putin would talk to, but I don't buy that the world is a worse place because the interview occurred, or because Tucker spewed some nonsense while in Russia. The question isn't a referendum on whether Tucker could be more to anybody's taste, it's whether Tucker, for all his faults, served a useful purpose here to someone other than Putin and himself. Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

                                How is it you can see this most salient of points, but our Northern neighbor has totally overlooked it?

                                Not overlooked it, but rather disregarded it.

                                Why? Because it’s what you, the apologist, want to believe about the interview. That and the fact that like your apologetics for Carlson, it is of little if any consequence.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #79

                                @Renauda said in Hannity Offers:

                                @Jolly said in Hannity Offers:

                                @Horace said in Hannity Offers:

                                There is a fact that Putin talked to him in an unscripted long form interview. No other journalist was given that opportunity. Of course you can see it as Tucker being just the sort of useful idiot that Putin would talk to, but I don't buy that the world is a worse place because the interview occurred, or because Tucker spewed some nonsense while in Russia. The question isn't a referendum on whether Tucker could be more to anybody's taste, it's whether Tucker, for all his faults, served a useful purpose here to someone other than Putin and himself. Personally I am glad the interview took place, though of course it wasn't a game changer to any extent.

                                How is it you can see this most salient of points, but our Northern neighbor has totally overlooked it?

                                Not overlooked it, but rather disregarded it.

                                Why? Because it’s what you, the apologist, want to believe about the interview. That and the fact that like your apologetics for Carlson, it is of little if any consequence.

                                And what are you, but some bitter asshole with a good smattering of knowledge about all things Russia and the inability to do a damn thing about it? What consequence do you bring to the world? Hopefully, your spouse, children and your grandchildren are showered with understanding and love, because you bring damn little of it here.

                                Of what worth are you?

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • RenaudaR Offline
                                  RenaudaR Offline
                                  Renauda
                                  wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                  #80

                                  Of what worth are you?

                                  Every bit as much as you which is obviously damn little to most folks but of some note to people unlike yourself.

                                  The bitter asshole shot though was a nice touch. Inaccurate, but a good college try all the same.

                                  Elbows up!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • JollyJ Offline
                                    JollyJ Offline
                                    Jolly
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #81

                                    Oh, I think that one hit.

                                    Enjoy your night.

                                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • RenaudaR Offline
                                      RenaudaR Offline
                                      Renauda
                                      wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                      #82

                                      If you say so. Just don’t think too hard, Beauregard. You’re liable to keep yourself up fretting about the future.

                                      Goodnight moon.

                                      Elbows up!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • JollyJ Jolly

                                        Whether you like the interview or not, has anybody else from America done an interview with Putin?

                                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                                        taiwan_girl
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #83

                                        @Jolly said in Hannity Offers:

                                        Whether you like the interview or not, has anybody else from America done an interview with Putin?

                                        Why do you think that is? Others have tried, but President Putin only agreed to talk with Mr. Carlson.

                                        I think it was because he knew that it really wouldn't be an "interview" at all.

                                        RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                                          @Jolly said in Hannity Offers:

                                          Whether you like the interview or not, has anybody else from America done an interview with Putin?

                                          Why do you think that is? Others have tried, but President Putin only agreed to talk with Mr. Carlson.

                                          I think it was because he knew that it really wouldn't be an "interview" at all.

                                          RenaudaR Offline
                                          RenaudaR Offline
                                          Renauda
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #84

                                          @taiwan_girl said in Hannity Offers:

                                          @Jolly said in Hannity Offers:

                                          Whether you like the interview or not, has anybody else from America done an interview with Putin?

                                          Why do you think that is? Others have tried, but President Putin only agreed to talk with Mr. Carlson.

                                          I think it was because he knew that it really wouldn't be an "interview" at all.

                                          The BBC’s Steve Rosenberg has been repeatedly requesting an interview on a regular basis for some years now. Request denied. No reason given.

                                          Elbows up!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups