Firings at CBS
-
@Jolly said in Firings at CBS:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Firings at CBS:
@George-K said in Firings at CBS:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Firings at CBS:
it seems like they're getting rid of some big positions, which kind of makes me think that isn't just some political shenanigans,
Yes, I see your point, and you're probably right.
But Herridge's files?
I've been a journalist, and I've seen journalists get laid off.
I've also seen a journalist get fired for plagiarism. They had security come up, escort the guy out of the office and down into the elevator. They walked with him very closely.
Even then they let the guy take his rolodex (yeah, no shit, he was still using one of those) and a box of files.
So, a couple of things:
- Yes, this is weird.
- Could be a lot of different reasons for it. One thing going on, media layoffs are handled very differently in recent years. It's more sneaky in a lot of places. They'll clean your desk out over the weekend and have your personal effects mailed to you—you get a message in email or on your phone. Or you might be asked out to lunch by your manager and on the elevator ride down, he tells you you're laid off and you're to escort the building. Or, sure, it could be some kind of conspiracy. Who knows. But it isn't standard practice. Not even close.
In that case, I believe I would have an info stash corporate could not get their hands on
Yeah, that's what I wonder about, too. Absolutely no way she didn't have copies.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Firings at CBS:
Yeah, that's what I wonder about, too. Absolutely no way she didn't have copies.
But it's more than a question of "having a backup."
It's a question of someone else, someone you probably don't trust, having access to confidential material - sources, etc.
If it becomes knowledge that your sources are no longer secure, your career as a journalist might well be over.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Firings at CBS:
Yeah, that's what I wonder about, too. Absolutely no way she didn't have copies.
But it's more than a question of "having a backup."
It's a question of someone else, someone you probably don't trust, having access to confidential material - sources, etc.
If it becomes knowledge that your sources are no longer secure, your career as a journalist might well be over.
@George-K said in Firings at CBS:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Firings at CBS:
Yeah, that's what I wonder about, too. Absolutely no way she didn't have copies.
But it's more than a question of "having a backup."
It's a question of someone else, someone you probably don't trust, having access to confidential material - sources, etc.
If it becomes knowledge that your sources are no longer secure, your career as a journalist might well be over.
No I get that, I'm just curious about the files themselves and if she has a backup.
-
https://www.sagaftra.org/sag-aftra-statement-cbs-news-return-reporters-files
February 26, 2024
SAG-AFTRA released the following statement:SAG-AFTRA is pleased to confirm that earlier today a representative of our union monitored the return of several boxes containing Catherine Herridge's reporting materials from her CBS News office in Washington D.C. Herridge is currently reviewing the materials.
We welcome CBS News' reversal which came after SAG-AFTRA's intervention and widespread media coverage that underscored shared concerns about press freedom and the First Amendment.
The resolution of this matter sends a strong message of protection for basic First Amendment principles. We further hope the public focus now turns to SAG-AFTRA's continued efforts to support a Press Shield law that provides additional federal protections for journalists and their confidential sources.
Unanswered: Who saw the confidential files, if anyone?
-
@Mik said in Firings at CBS:
Yes. While this is a feel-good action, it doesn't necessarily mitigate the harm done already.
Ten bucks says no follow-up reporting or investigations on this.
-
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/catherine-herridge-civil-contempt_n_65e115c8e4b013678e148e9e
Journalist Catherine Herridge Held In Civil Contempt For Refusing To Divulge Source
A federal judge has held the veteran investigative reporter in civil contempt for refusing to divulge her source for a series of stories during her time at Fox News. -
-
Really? She could have gone to any number of more independent journalists… Weiss, Taibbi, and such… But instead she goes Tucker?
The Brad
-
Really? She could have gone to any number of more independent journalists… Weiss, Taibbi, and such… But instead she goes Tucker?
@LuFins-Dad said in Firings at CBS:
Really? She could have gone to any number of more independent journalists… Weiss, Taibbi, and such… But instead she goes Tucker?
Broader footprint? Maybe he's just the first?
-
Really? She could have gone to any number of more independent journalists… Weiss, Taibbi, and such… But instead she goes Tucker?
@LuFins-Dad said in Firings at CBS:
Really? She could have gone to any number of more independent journalists… Weiss, Taibbi, and such… But instead she goes Tucker?
Thought the same thing.
Supposedly she has a stellar reputation for being a dogged reporter.
Gotta wonder why she left Fox a few years ago. Money or ideology.
