Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Before we were fat

Before we were fat

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
24 Posts 12 Posters 306 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • X xenon

    @bachophile said in Before we were fat:

    Life expectancy at birth in 1930 was 58 for men and 62 for women.

    so the idea that in the 30s, people were healthier doesnt really hold water.

    That's lower than expected. I wonder how much of the effect is due to infant mortality going down.

    George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by George K
    #21

    @xenon said in Before we were fat:

    That's lower than expected. I wonder how much of the effect is due to infant mortality going down.

    Good point. I wonder how it would be if you eliminated deaths during the first year of life.

    In Rome:

    However, if a person survived childhood, their life expectancy would increase significantly.

    For example, a Roman reaching the age of 10 could expect to live to around 45 or 50.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_the_Roman_Empire

    Screenshot 2024-02-12 at 1.43.49 PM.png

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
      #22

      Vaccines, antibiotics, and civil engineering are chiefly responsible for the increase from what I’ve read.

      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        How about “All of the above”?

        The Brad

        1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG George K

          @xenon said in Before we were fat:

          That's lower than expected. I wonder how much of the effect is due to infant mortality going down.

          Good point. I wonder how it would be if you eliminated deaths during the first year of life.

          In Rome:

          However, if a person survived childhood, their life expectancy would increase significantly.

          For example, a Roman reaching the age of 10 could expect to live to around 45 or 50.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_the_Roman_Empire

          Screenshot 2024-02-12 at 1.43.49 PM.png

          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          @George-K That is interesting Half the people died before age 10 years.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups