Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Newspapers Lose Money Despite Billionaires' ownerships

Newspapers Lose Money Despite Billionaires' ownerships

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
6 Posts 4 Posters 56 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AxtremusA Offline
    AxtremusA Offline
    Axtremus
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/18/business/media/billionaires-news-media-owners.html

    ... Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, bought The Washington Post in 2013 for about $250 million. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a biotechnology and start-up billionaire, purchased The Los Angeles Times in 2018 for $500 million. Marc Benioff, the founder of the software giant Salesforce, purchased Time magazine with his wife, Lynne, for $190 million in 2018.
    ...
    But it increasingly appears that the billionaires are struggling just like nearly everyone else. Time, The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times all lost millions of dollars last year, people with knowledge of the companies’ finances have said, after considerable investment from their owners and intensive efforts to drum up new revenue streams.
    ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      It’s the other way around. Only billionaires buy them because they’re money losers. NYT is an exception, one of few.

      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Give them time.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          https://www.thewrap.com/la-times-emergancy-meeting-possible-layoffs/

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            Give them time.

            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
            #5

            @Jolly said in Newspapers Lose Money Despite Billionaires' ownerships:

            Give them time.

            10 years ago I would have agreed with you but it appears to be the case that a few global brands are thriving while regional and local papers are suffering.

            If you’re a left of center college grad in (say) Ft Wayne, IN, you’re far more likely to subscribe to the NYT than a local newspaper or the Chicago Tribune.

            It’s something of a winner-take-most market now.

            Thank you for your attention to this matter.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • taiwan_girlT Offline
              taiwan_girlT Offline
              taiwan_girl
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              The bad thing about the loss of the newspapers is that paper will get more and more of their news from a "silo". If you start reading articles, etc. that are more from the left (or right) side, search engines will start to recommend only those types of articles and you miss out on the other sides point of view.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups