First representative study (I know of)
-
How would this affect policy? If hard-hit areas still have relatively low serology surely the primary conclusion is any curve-bending we see is due to social distancing and not herd immunity.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
The study is evidence that mortality rates are much lower than what the division exercises of the Johns Hopkins numbers suggest. Of course that affects policy. From what I understand, our government now considers it to be time to come up with a time plan to eventually get back to normal.
-
How would this affect policy? If hard-hit areas still have relatively low serology surely the primary conclusion is any curve-bending we see is due to social distancing and not herd immunity.
@jon-nyc said in First representative study (I know of):
How would this affect policy?
Also, your political instinct seems to be off.
Maybe you think it shouldn't affect public policy, and maybe you have good reasons for that (or not). But as a matter of fact it does.
Here's a random sample of news articles about this study from today. They all contain the same words: "Lockerung" - easing/relaxation of the quarantine. A surprisingly high immunity. A surprisingly low death rate.
-
@jon-nyc said in First representative study (I know of):
How would this affect policy?
Also, your political instinct seems to be off.
Maybe you think it shouldn't affect public policy, and maybe you have good reasons for that (or not). But as a matter of fact it does.
Here's a random sample of news articles about this study from today. They all contain the same words: "Lockerung" - easing/relaxation of the quarantine. A surprisingly high immunity. A surprisingly low death rate.
@Klaus said in First representative study (I know of):
@jon-nyc said in First representative study (I know of):
How would this affect policy?
Also, your political instinct seems to be off.
Maybe you think it shouldn't affect public policy, and maybe you have good reasons for that (or not). But as a matter of fact it does.
Here's a random sample of news articles about this study from today. They all contain the same words: "Lockerung" - easing/relaxation of the quarantine. A surprisingly high immunity. A surprisingly low death rate.
Wonder if the population genetic make-up plays any factor?
-
@Klaus said in First representative study (I know of):
@jon-nyc said in First representative study (I know of):
How would this affect policy?
Also, your political instinct seems to be off.
Maybe you think it shouldn't affect public policy, and maybe you have good reasons for that (or not). But as a matter of fact it does.
Here's a random sample of news articles about this study from today. They all contain the same words: "Lockerung" - easing/relaxation of the quarantine. A surprisingly high immunity. A surprisingly low death rate.
Wonder if the population genetic make-up plays any factor?
@Jolly said in First representative study (I know of):
@Klaus said in First representative study (I know of):
@jon-nyc said in First representative study (I know of):
How would this affect policy?
Also, your political instinct seems to be off.
Maybe you think it shouldn't affect public policy, and maybe you have good reasons for that (or not). But as a matter of fact it does.
Here's a random sample of news articles about this study from today. They all contain the same words: "Lockerung" - easing/relaxation of the quarantine. A surprisingly high immunity. A surprisingly low death rate.
Wonder if the population genetic make-up plays any factor?
I have been thinking and talking to my wife about that. I think genetics has a huge role in this.
-
I'm guessing that too, mark. Would explain part of the random severity of the disease in some and not in others.
