Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. USA, wtf

USA, wtf

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
18 Posts 7 Posters 211 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KlausK Offline
    KlausK Offline
    Klaus
    wrote on last edited by Klaus
    #1

    https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2020-07-25/u-s-escalates-pressure-over-nord-stream-2-welt-am-sonntag-says

    Doesn't the US have enough problems of their own? Why do they have to mess with our energy problems? And brake every trade law on the way? Let alone turning friends into enemies. And all of this only to sell more gas to Europe? Unfair and just wtf.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • Catseye3C Offline
      Catseye3C Offline
      Catseye3
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Wiki: "Both projects [Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2] have been opposed by the United States as well as several Central and Eastern European countries because of concerns that it would increase Russia's influence in the region. The U.S. resistance of Nord Stream 2 is also influenced by the country's increased production of natural gas, which gives the U.S. Congress economic incentive to resist the Russian supply of gas to the EU, in favour of U.S. shale gas."

      And (lightly edited):

      "In June 2017, Germany and Austria criticized the United States Senate over new sanctions against Russia that target the planned Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, stating that the United States was threatening Europe's energy supplies. In a joint statement Austria and Germany said that "Europe's energy supply is a matter for Europe, and not for the United States of America." They also said: "To threaten companies from Germany, Austria and other European states with penalties on the U.S. market if they participate in natural gas projects such as Nord Stream 2 with Russia . . . introduces a completely new and very negative quality into European-American relations."

      These excerpts are from a detailed backgrounder in Wiki that includes an extensive list of references: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nord_Stream#Political_aspects

      Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

      KlausK 1 Reply Last reply
      • Catseye3C Catseye3

        Wiki: "Both projects [Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2] have been opposed by the United States as well as several Central and Eastern European countries because of concerns that it would increase Russia's influence in the region. The U.S. resistance of Nord Stream 2 is also influenced by the country's increased production of natural gas, which gives the U.S. Congress economic incentive to resist the Russian supply of gas to the EU, in favour of U.S. shale gas."

        And (lightly edited):

        "In June 2017, Germany and Austria criticized the United States Senate over new sanctions against Russia that target the planned Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, stating that the United States was threatening Europe's energy supplies. In a joint statement Austria and Germany said that "Europe's energy supply is a matter for Europe, and not for the United States of America." They also said: "To threaten companies from Germany, Austria and other European states with penalties on the U.S. market if they participate in natural gas projects such as Nord Stream 2 with Russia . . . introduces a completely new and very negative quality into European-American relations."

        These excerpts are from a detailed backgrounder in Wiki that includes an extensive list of references: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nord_Stream#Political_aspects

        KlausK Offline
        KlausK Offline
        Klaus
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Catseye3 said in USA, wtf:

        Both projects [Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2] have been opposed by the United States as well as several Central and Eastern European countries because of concerns that it would increase Russia's influence in the region.

        That' BS.

        The Central/Eastern European countries are worried that they can no longer use the threat to cut down the supply lines that run through their countries to "enhance" their diplomacy. The US wants to sell gas.

        Options are never a disadvantage.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • Catseye3C Offline
          Catseye3C Offline
          Catseye3
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I wasn't presenting the above as my own opinion; I don't know enough to have an opinion.

          But why can't they both be true? That is, desire to sell gas as well as worry over Russia's increased influence?

          Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

          1 Reply Last reply
          • KlausK Offline
            KlausK Offline
            Klaus
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Because according to the law of parismony, it is more likely that one of them is merely a pretext to hide the other one.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • Catseye3C Offline
              Catseye3C Offline
              Catseye3
              wrote on last edited by Catseye3
              #6

              They can still both be true. Putting one interest out in front doesn't negate the existence of the other one.

              Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

              KlausK 1 Reply Last reply
              • Catseye3C Catseye3

                They can still both be true. Putting one interest out in front doesn't negate the existence of the other one.

                KlausK Offline
                KlausK Offline
                Klaus
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @Catseye3 said in USA, wtf:

                They can still both be true. Putting one interest out in front doesn't negate the existence of the other one.

                No, not in this case. The trade deficit between US and Russia is far bigger than between EU and Russia. The US itself is using a lot of Russian energy products. If dependence on Russia really were an issue, the US could easily start with this on their home turf instead of sticking their nose into the trade of their partners and using methods that Al Capone could have come up with.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • Catseye3C Offline
                  Catseye3C Offline
                  Catseye3
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Thanks for the clarification. This gets into unfamiliar territory for me. Very interesting, though.

                  Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • Catseye3C Offline
                    Catseye3C Offline
                    Catseye3
                    wrote on last edited by Catseye3
                    #9

                    Here is an interesting chart of the trade deficit/surplus status of all the countries in the world. The information is also presented in a color-coded world map.

                    For example, the US is -4.31% of GDP;

                    Germany is 6.63%;

                    UK is -7.81%;

                    China is 2.94%;

                    Russia is 9.69%;

                    Afganistan is -33.23%;

                    https://countryeconomy.com/trade/balance

                    Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • RenaudaR Offline
                      RenaudaR Offline
                      Renauda
                      wrote on last edited by Renauda
                      #10

                      I have to agree with Klaus on this. It's all about the US wanting to sell its gas into Europe. That, and a misplaced sense of entitlement to meddle in the internal affairs of other countries.

                      Elbows up!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • Doctor PhibesD Online
                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Making America grate, again.

                        I was only joking

                        RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                        • CopperC Offline
                          CopperC Offline
                          Copper
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Whether we provide assistance or meddle

                          depends on whether you are buying or selling.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                            Making America grate, again.

                            RenaudaR Offline
                            RenaudaR Offline
                            Renauda
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @Doctor-Phibes

                            That would be about right. Grate. Like a stucco bathtub.

                            Elbows up!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • KlausK Offline
                              KlausK Offline
                              Klaus
                              wrote on last edited by Klaus
                              #14

                              New blackmail from US senators.

                              https://www.cruz.senate.gov/files/documents/Letters/2020.08.05 Final Mukran Port Letter.pdf

                              Are they not aware that this letter will make it completely impossible for Germany to not finish the pipeline? Now it's not a question of energy safety and economics anymore. It has become a question of whether we are a free country or not. There isn't a single politician who would dare to call the project off after this, regardless of the costs.

                              Is that really the way how the US wants to conduct foreign policy in the future? By bullying and blackmailing allies?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • Catseye3C Offline
                                Catseye3C Offline
                                Catseye3
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                It would be interesting to learn about the whole to-and-fro (in detail) between Russia and the US over Nord Stream II from the beginning. I'll bet it's a pip. My own knowledge is practically non-existent.

                                Subtext to MAGA. "America: Making Friends Wherever We Go." First China, then Europe. Who's next? Has Borneo done anything annoying lately?

                                I guess having an asshole in the White House for four years can result in such deterioration in US global influence that bellicose letters like this become warranted.

                                The near warlike tone suggests the US is running scared. Great strategy. And yes, a virtual guarantee that the pipeline will go forward.

                                Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                                taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                                • Catseye3C Catseye3

                                  It would be interesting to learn about the whole to-and-fro (in detail) between Russia and the US over Nord Stream II from the beginning. I'll bet it's a pip. My own knowledge is practically non-existent.

                                  Subtext to MAGA. "America: Making Friends Wherever We Go." First China, then Europe. Who's next? Has Borneo done anything annoying lately?

                                  I guess having an asshole in the White House for four years can result in such deterioration in US global influence that bellicose letters like this become warranted.

                                  The near warlike tone suggests the US is running scared. Great strategy. And yes, a virtual guarantee that the pipeline will go forward.

                                  taiwan_girlT Online
                                  taiwan_girlT Online
                                  taiwan_girl
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  One of my major frustrations with President Trump and his policies is that he seems to look at everything that is has to be a "win - lose".

                                  In other words, if I win, you have to lose.

                                  My whole career, I have learned that it is best to try and make things a "win-win". I realize it is not possible to do this in all situations, but it can certainly be that way in many (if not most) cases.

                                  A win-lose mentality only causes long term problems in foreign relations, etc.

                                  I think that the above case is just one example of President Trumps "win-lose" philosophy.

                                  We have discussed before, but I do believe that relations with foreign countries is probably lower worldwide than it has been in a long long time,

                                  CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                                    One of my major frustrations with President Trump and his policies is that he seems to look at everything that is has to be a "win - lose".

                                    In other words, if I win, you have to lose.

                                    My whole career, I have learned that it is best to try and make things a "win-win". I realize it is not possible to do this in all situations, but it can certainly be that way in many (if not most) cases.

                                    A win-lose mentality only causes long term problems in foreign relations, etc.

                                    I think that the above case is just one example of President Trumps "win-lose" philosophy.

                                    We have discussed before, but I do believe that relations with foreign countries is probably lower worldwide than it has been in a long long time,

                                    CopperC Offline
                                    CopperC Offline
                                    Copper
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @taiwan_girl said in USA, wtf:

                                    One of my major frustrations with President Trump and his policies is that he seems to look at everything that is has to be a "win - lose".

                                    The previous president had a similar approach.

                                    Except "win" wasn't an option.

                                    MAGA

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • LarryL Offline
                                      LarryL Offline
                                      Larry
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      I totally disagree with the notion that Trump is a "win/lose" type. That is purely an opinion, one reached without paying attention to what he actually does.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups