Embeds?
-
Safari gives a warning about that url
Interesting. I didn't a couple of hours ago.
DuckDuckGo gives an error as well.
Doing a DuckDuckGo search for "reporters embeded hamas" yields a story:
-
It’s complicated. They hire freelancers from the region. That seems like the safe thing to do. It’s not like Arthur Schulzberger was sitting on this news for three days.
It’s complicated. They hire freelancers from the region. That seems like the safe thing to do. It’s not like Arthur Schulzberger was sitting on this news for three days.
The obvious question is whether the reporters knew "something big" was coming. If so, you have to wonder.
-
OK, so the photographers all knew it was going down, but US and Israeli intelligence were oblivious?
The spooks must be well shit.
-
Proving anything beyond “we were told to bring cameras and be at ______ the night before.” Would be a hard pull.
But, being an “independent” journalist at a location where this shit was going down and not trying to even protest let alone interfere? That’s inhuman.
-
What would be said about embedded reporters with US Troops in Iraq witnessing atrocities and not trying to intervene?
-
What would be said about embedded reporters with US Troops in Iraq witnessing atrocities and not trying to intervene?
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Embeds?:
What would be said about embedded reporters with US Troops in Iraq witnessing atrocities and not trying to intervene?
These guys were freelance.
If that makes a difference.
@LuFins-Dad said in Embeds?:
What would be said about embedded reporters with US Troops in Iraq witnessing atrocities and not trying to intervene?
These guys were freelance.
If that makes a difference.
I think some of the embeds with the US Troops back in the day were free lance as well. Don’t see a difference.
-
