Meanwhile, at Harvard...
-
wrote on 17 Oct 2023, 15:47 last edited by
@George-K said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Ummm...if you sign a letter, it's not "doxxing" when people see you signed the letter.
Stop making sense!!! LOL
-
wrote on 17 Oct 2023, 16:52 last edited by
There seems to be a little bit of an issue where the executives of these student groups unilaterally made the decision to sign the letter on behalf of the group without consent of the group itself. I read a story where one young lady was at a meeting for one student group talking them out of signing the letter while the leader of another group she was a member of was signing the document…
-
wrote on 17 Oct 2023, 17:16 last edited by
Gee, that's how reform starts...
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 16:39 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Don’t ever let anyone tell you cancel culture is only a trait of the woke.
Speaking of Canceled, Voice Actress Tara Strong was fired for posting support for Israel and Anti-Hamas posts.
-
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 01:47 last edited by
@George-K said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Another reason to not go to Starbucks:
LOL.
Starbucks: "No, you can't use our name."
Starbucks and the union organizing its workers sued each other Wednesday in a standoff sparked by a social media post over the Israel-Hamas war.
Starbucks sued Workers United in federal court in Iowa Wednesday, saying a pro-Palestinian social media post from a union account early in the Israel-Hamas war angered hundreds of customers and damaged its reputation.
Starbucks is suing for trademark infringement, demanding that Workers United stop using the name “Starbucks Workers United” for the group that is organizing the coffee company’s workers.
Starbucks also wants the group to stop using a circular green logo that resembles Starbucks’ logo.
Workers United responded with its own filing, asking a federal court in Pennsylvania to rule that it can continue to use Starbucks’ name and a similar logo.
Workers United also said Starbucks defamed the union by implying that it supports terrorism and violence.
-
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 02:05 last edited by
That's an awesome lawsuit. It'll be fascinating to watch.
-
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 02:14 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
That's an awesome lawsuit. It'll be fascinating to watch.
Isn't it though?
Time to set up some "google alerts" for news..."
-
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 02:16 last edited by
The workers are stupid for backing Palestine.
Starbucks are stupid for hiring those workers.
Their customers are stupid for supporting this bunch.
-
The workers are stupid for backing Palestine.
Starbucks are stupid for hiring those workers.
Their customers are stupid for supporting this bunch.
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 13:47 last edited by@Copper said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Starbucks are stupid for hiring those workers.
Putting on my Ax hat
I don't think that Starbucks can ask their opinion on the war as a requirement for hiring.
But to me, this is an obvious infringement of the logo of Starbucks.
-
@Copper said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Starbucks are stupid for hiring those workers.
Putting on my Ax hat
I don't think that Starbucks can ask their opinion on the war as a requirement for hiring.
But to me, this is an obvious infringement of the logo of Starbucks.
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 14:44 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
I don't think that Starbucks can ask their opinion on the war as a requirement for hiring.
Why not?
-
@taiwan_girl said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
I don't think that Starbucks can ask their opinion on the war as a requirement for hiring.
Why not?
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 15:05 last edited by@Copper said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@taiwan_girl said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
I don't think that Starbucks can ask their opinion on the war as a requirement for hiring.
Why not?
I would think that would somehow be prohibited. Your private views should not be a criteria.
Now, if you start saying those private views after you are hired, either with or without company resources, than it can be a problem for you.
-
@Copper said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@taiwan_girl said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
I don't think that Starbucks can ask their opinion on the war as a requirement for hiring.
Why not?
I would think that would somehow be prohibited. Your private views should not be a criteria.
Now, if you start saying those private views after you are hired, either with or without company resources, than it can be a problem for you.
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 15:18 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Your private views should not be a criteria.
Why not?
I wouldn't hire anyone that might support Joe Biden. That only makes good sense.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Your private views should not be a criteria.
Why not?
I wouldn't hire anyone that might support Joe Biden. That only makes good sense.
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 15:19 last edited by@Copper said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@taiwan_girl said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Your private views should not be a criteria.
Why not?
I wouldn't hire anyone that might support Joe Biden. That only makes good sense.
Are you actually hiring anybody right now? Like at all?
-
@Copper said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@taiwan_girl said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Your private views should not be a criteria.
Why not?
I wouldn't hire anyone that might support Joe Biden. That only makes good sense.
Are you actually hiring anybody right now? Like at all?
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 15:20 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Are you actually hiring anybody right now? Like at all?
No, I should have said the wise employer wouldn't hire anyone that might support Joe Biden.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Are you actually hiring anybody right now? Like at all?
No, I should have said the wise employer wouldn't hire anyone that might support Joe Biden.
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 15:22 last edited by@Copper said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Are you actually hiring anybody right now? Like at all?
No, I should have said the wise employer wouldn't hire anyone that might support Joe Biden.
I mean, if you got a lawn guy or something I suppose you could inquire.
-
@Copper said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Are you actually hiring anybody right now? Like at all?
No, I should have said the wise employer wouldn't hire anyone that might support Joe Biden.
I mean, if you got a lawn guy or something I suppose you could inquire.
wrote on 20 Oct 2023, 00:35 last edited by Renauda@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@Copper said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Are you actually hiring anybody right now? Like at all?
No, I should have said the wise employer wouldn't hire anyone that might support Joe Biden.
I mean, if you got a lawn guy or something I suppose you could inquire.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@Copper said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
Are you actually hiring anybody right now? Like at all?
No, I should have said the wise employer wouldn't hire anyone that might support Joe Biden.
I mean, if you got a lawn guy or something I suppose you could inquire.
I think it would be an important question for any self respecting bourgeois in determining the qualifications of all proletarian slugs seeking meagre employment.
-
@George-K said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
How do you NOT respond to a comment like that without this meme.
C'mon man.
He’s been busy keeping his finger on the pulse. Too busy to go looking for silly memes.
That’s how.
It's the same thing! The former necessarily means the latter.
wrote on 20 Oct 2023, 00:50 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@George-K said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Meanwhile, at Harvard...:
How do you NOT respond to a comment like that without this meme.
C'mon man.
He’s been busy keeping his finger on the pulse. Too busy to go looking for silly memes.
That’s how.
It's the same thing! The former necessarily means the latter.
Yep nothing without a meme is real in popular culture.
-
wrote on 21 Oct 2023, 20:36 last edited by
Furthermore at Harvard...
WTF is wrong with these people?
-
wrote on 21 Oct 2023, 23:20 last edited by
