More strange and/or foul reactions
-
I will never forgive you for putting me in the position of defending Elizabeth Warren, but her reaction is neither strange nor foul. It is the modal position of first world governments.
While I don’t agree with her, it doesn’t really belong in the same photo as, say, people painting threatening messages on the houses of ‘Zionist’ museum board members.
wrote on 24 Jul 2024, 22:31 last edited by@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
her reaction is neither strange nor foul. It is the modal position of first world governments.
What part of what she said is true and verifiable by someone other than Hamas?
The number of dead?
The prevention of humanitarian aid, starving?
Assigning blame for the hostages being in Gaza on Netanyahu?
Indiscriminate bombing?
Negotiating table - what has Hamas brought to the table?You want an immediate ceasefire? Israel will give it to you tomorrow - on one condition.
-
wrote on 24 Jul 2024, 22:43 last edited by
You missed the point. This isn’t the fact check thread.
-
wrote on 24 Jul 2024, 22:48 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
You missed the point. This isn’t the fact check thread.
That's right. It's the "Foul reactions" thread.
You didn't criticize my posting Omar's statement.
You might disagree, but I'd characterize Warren's as foul and inappropriate.
-
@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
You missed the point. This isn’t the fact check thread.
That's right. It's the "Foul reactions" thread.
You didn't criticize my posting Omar's statement.
You might disagree, but I'd characterize Warren's as foul and inappropriate.
wrote on 24 Jul 2024, 22:50 last edited by@George-K said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
You didn't criticize my posting Omar's statement.
To be fair she is both strange and foul. Even posting her official headshot fits with the purpose of the thread.
-
wrote on 25 Jul 2024, 00:33 last edited by
Glad I was not in Wash DC this week.
-
Glad I was not in Wash DC this week.
wrote on 25 Jul 2024, 02:49 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
Glad I was not in Wash DC this week.
We postponed all deliveries into DC this week. We were supposed to deliver a unit to The Watergate, where Netanyahu is staying… The customer actually postponed that knowing the trouble…
-
@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
You missed the point. This isn’t the fact check thread.
That's right. It's the "Foul reactions" thread.
You didn't criticize my posting Omar's statement.
You might disagree, but I'd characterize Warren's as foul and inappropriate.
wrote on 25 Jul 2024, 10:55 last edited by@George-K said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
You missed the point. This isn’t the fact check thread.
That's right. It's the "Foul reactions" thread.
You didn't criticize my posting Omar's statement.
You might disagree, but I'd characterize Warren's as foul and inappropriate.
What do you expect? The woman thinks one of Harris' big accomplishment is visiting an abortion clinic...
-
wrote on 25 Jul 2024, 11:01 last edited by
-
wrote on 25 Jul 2024, 11:19 last edited by
-
wrote on 25 Jul 2024, 11:58 last edited by
I’m trying to pull up the speech to watch it. How long was it? Some of the videos I am seeing are over 2 hours long…
-
I’m trying to pull up the speech to watch it. How long was it? Some of the videos I am seeing are over 2 hours long…
wrote on 25 Jul 2024, 12:27 last edited byhttps://www.c-span.org/video/?536521-1/israeli-prime-minister-delivers-speech-joint-meeting-congress
It's about an hour, from what I can gather.
Starts at about 0:33 and is over at 1:26.
-
wrote on 25 Jul 2024, 14:22 last edited by
It began with lots of military hero stories. After that, was very standard rhetoric that you will have seen before on twitter or even here. "People who say from the river to the sea can't name the river or the sea", "Gays for Palestine is like chickens for KFC". The weakest rhetoric was when Bibi said "practically no civilians" had been killed, then admitted that actually 24 people were killed accidentally by a bomb, then reiterated that "practically zero civilians had been killed".
I guess this is the stuff of political speeches, because this is the stuff that works best. Nobody is interested in hearing intelligent things, or not enough people are interested. Just ra ra rhetoric.
-
wrote on 3 Aug 2024, 12:22 last edited by
Prosecutors across America have dropped criminal charges against over 300 anti-Israel encampment protesters in recent months.
An analysis by Campus Reform found that 301 anti-Israel protesters who were arrested after participating in encampments at colleges and universities have had their charges dropped by local prosecutors.
The charges dropped by prosecutors range from trespassing, resisting a police officer, occupying a property without consent, battery, felony burglary, and more.
Local prosecutors dropped the following charges:
-
School of the Art Institute of Chicago: 80 criminal charges were dropped.
-
University of Texas at Austin: 79 criminal charges were dropped. Protesters were attempting to form an encampment.
-
Indiana University: 56 criminal charges were dropped.
-
Columbia University: 31 criminal charges have been dropped.
-
California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt: 27 criminal charges have been dropped.
-
University of Minnesota: 9 criminal charges have been dropped.
-
University of New Hampshire: 8 criminal charges have been dropped.
-
The City University of New York: 7 criminal charges have been dropped.
-
Northwestern University: 4 criminal charges have been dropped.
-
-
wrote on 3 Aug 2024, 12:52 last edited by
January 6.
Now, tell me again how prosecution and sentencing has not been selective.
-
Out of 3200 arrested? Less than 10%. That’s better than I would have thought.
Or any of us would have thought.
wrote on 3 Aug 2024, 13:19 last edited by@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
Out of 3100 arrested? Less than 10%. That’s better than I would have thought.
Are you suggesting that the other 2800 are going to trial?
-
wrote on 3 Aug 2024, 13:30 last edited by jon-nyc 8 Mar 2024, 13:37
That would never happen under any conceivable scenario in any jurisdiction except police states that do mass show trials. Most cases are pled. Nowhere do we have resources to take every arrest to trial.
-
That would never happen under any conceivable scenario in any jurisdiction except police states that do mass show trials. Most cases are pled. Nowhere do we have resources to take every arrest to trial.
wrote on 3 Aug 2024, 14:03 last edited by@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
Most cases are pled. Nowhere do we have resources to take every arrest to trial.
Good point. Do you think that 90% of the arrested/charged will plea to a lesser charge? Only will 2% go to trial if history is an indicator.
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2024, 11:42 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Oct 2024, 22:00 last edited by
