Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Kill-to-loss ratios in WWII fighters - Buffaloed.

Kill-to-loss ratios in WWII fighters - Buffaloed.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
5 Posts 2 Posters 28 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Link to video

    tl;dw

    8 - P-38 Lightning - 7:1 ratio
    7 - P-51 Mustang - 11:1 ratio
    6 - Vought F4U Corsair - 11:1 ratio
    5 - Supermarine Spitfire - 13:1 ratio
    4 - Curtis P-40 Warhawk - 18:1 ratio
    3 - Grumman F6F Hellcat - 19:1 ratio
    2 - Messerschmidt BF 109 - 21:1 ratio
    1 - Brewster F2A Buffalo - 26:1 ratio

    The "Buffalo?"

    In the comments: "The Buffalo had a high success rate due to the Finnish pilots vastly outclassing their Soviet enemies.
    In the Pacific, it was the opposite story with allied Buffaloes being massacred by the Japanese who had better aircraft and better trained pilots early in the war."

    "The F2 Brewster Buffalo was selected as #1 because it shot down a bunch of Russian aircraft. Yet, it was outclassed by every other aircraft from the Axis air forces like the Japanese Zero. Perhaps the Fins could have taught the other Allied pilots how to fly it."

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Overall, the kill ratio numbers are exaggerated. Two, while the Buffalo was not a horrible aircraft for the time, its best days were in a narrow window in Finland. Elsewhere, not so good. Lastly, well-trained and seasoned pilots make a huge difference, given any two comparable aircraft.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        As the war crept on, and veteran pilots were killed or no longer flying, the U.S. had an advantage. American pilots had more training and cockpit time in flight school than Axis pilots. It showed.

        Personally, I feel that it would be a good thing to return to a free pilot training program in American universities. Screen and teach young men who wish to learn, and bring them up to a basic proficiency in a single engine prop plane. If we need to train pilots at a later date, a pool of people will exist who can be brought along much quicker.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Glad to hear your input.

          I was thinking, speculating, about some of the points you made before you posted. Training and environment are huge factors. The first comment I quoted says, basically that regarding the Buffalo when it comes to those points.

          I wonder what the ratio was for the Zero. Notably, no Japanese fighters are listed.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Early in the war, very good.

            But the Americans were learning to fight the Zero pretty early in the war. The Cactus Air Force at Guadalcanal achieved some success with Wildcats and P-400 (export version P-39) at first and got better the more they flew.

            They tended to attack from a dive, employed the Thatcher Weave https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thach_Weave
            and never tried to engage the Zero in slow or low level combat.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Users
            • Groups