Pretty soon you're talking about real money
-
- Single-payer universal healthcare doesn't necessarily mean long waiting times or bad health service. In some countries it works well, in other countries not so much.
- There are various health systems that work better than the American one that are not single-payer universal.
I have the impression that the healthcare debate in the US is much too focused on a seemingly one-dimensional binary decision, but in reality health care systems have many many dimensions, and there are many incremental improvements on dimensions different from single-payer universal vs private.
-
-
That sucks, Horace.
I had a part time unpaid job after my transplant getting everything sorted out. Lasted for months. It got to where I had the desk number and email of a woman at United Health Care and we were sending spreadsheets back and forth with the status of various claims.
-
My impression is that reports from boots on the ground in various countries, as they consume their own health care, are overwhelmingly not in favor of the reports from Americans. More often than not it boils down to people from other countries agape at the stuff we Americans have to deal with and saying a silent thank you to their God that the don't have to.
-
They just need to refile. Errors like this are common.
Always remember, Operation Valkyrie was an act of sedition.
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion. -
-
@ILM said in Pretty soon you're talking about real money:
Horace,
You don’t have to do anything. The price you see is the max retail price. Your insurance will cover your costs. Give it time, and you will see that your out-of-pocket will be much, much lower!!I think that's right.
-
@ILM said in Pretty soon you're talking about real money:
Horace,
You don’t have to do anything. The price you see is the max retail price. Your insurance will cover your costs. Give it time, and you will see that your out-of-pocket will be much, much lower!!Not in my experience, unless you want it to get really nasty(Jolly, who has been known to rack up several years of >$100,000 full retail bills)
-
There is no margin in letting it be, and as far as I'm aware, the laws of the land dictate that I legally owe this place $94000 at this moment, because that's the number they chose to write on the bill they sent my insurance company as an "out of network" provider. I am not aware of any laws preventing them from writing 94m instead, so I can be glad they did not. If I get hit by a bus and all my heirs also get hit by a bus, that surgery center gets the 94k from my estate.
Education is extremely important.
-
@Horace said in Pretty soon you're talking about real money:
There is no margin in letting it be, and as far as I'm aware, the laws of the land dictate that I legally owe this place $94000 at this moment, because that's the number they chose to write on the bill they sent my insurance company as an "out of network" provider. I am not aware of any laws preventing them from writing 94m instead, so I can be glad they did not. If I get hit by a bus and all my heirs also get hit by a bus, that surgery center gets the 94k from my estate.
Didn't you have to have this surgery pre-approved?
-
That was the verbal story I was given at the time. Along with a warning from the surgery center Administrator to call her if I had any trouble from my insurance company. Which sank my heart a bit. I worried that she knew she was going to be trying something they might not like. Then there was the wording on the estimate, the first line of which warns that the bill sent to the insurance company will be large but that I shouldn't worry because these things get negotiated down. But behold, no negotiation, just retail, right there on my insurance company's website that collates all my current medical bills. And when I called the insurance company, they are uninterested in doing anything about it. They just want me to call the surgery center. And I can't get in touch with the surgery center Admin because she's on vacation this week.
It's a little odd that the surgery center is "out of network" since they work exclusively with surgeons who are "in network" for my insurance. I think they intentionally are "out of network" so they can send these sorts of bills and leave the patient with the choice of paying the cash immediately to make it go away, or letting them suffer under the massive debt.
-
You're either pre-approved, or you aren't. If you were pre-approved, the surgery center screwed up the filing. It needs to be refiled. If you were lied to, and you weren't told you were not pre-approved...Might be time to get very serious
-
I don't know from pre-approved. The estimate I was given before the surgery indicated uncertainty but a specific number was quoted that I would be expected to pay within 15 days of receiving the statement. Which I have never received, for some reason. There was a number to call, on this estimate. I called it and a recording told me to email them because they're not in the office because COVID. The email address is "collections@<blah>.com". Collections, of all things. I guess they want you to know they're not messing around. I emailed them last night and received this in response this morning:
Good Morning,
Because we are out of network, as a courtesy to the Provider and the patient we are accepting the carrier payment, you are only responsible for $1,444.23, as per the agreement this needed to be paid 15 days after the procedure.
Kindly call me to make your payment.
So this person doubles down on the "out of network" aspect. Of which I was never apprised prior to surgery, and which would seem to preclude any pre-approval from my insurance company.
Note also that the email says I needed to pay within 15 days of the procedure, while the written estimate indicated 15 days from when I receive the statement. Which I have never received.
-
The US has a weird system.
The insurers are the customer, patients just a necessary input.
My understanding is that often the physicians and practitioners have no idea what the procedures they do ending up costing. There’s no mechanism in the system to understand the cost / benefit of treatment A vs treatment B.
As in treatment A maybe be 10x more expensive than treatment B, but only slightly more effective in trials. (Or even essentially the same level of effectiveness)
The system is set up that way though. An analogy I heard on an econtalk podcast was that it’s like going to dinner and splitting the bill. You know everyone else might order steak, so you order surf and turf too. Everyone does. We all split the bill and insurance pays. So everyone gets the absolute best that money will buy, at all times.
There’s few market mechanisms in place to keep the cost down. The hospital often doesn’t even know its cost for procedures.
It’s not a market system. It’s a system where we have unlimited private money going in to a system without cost controls.
-
That podcast was excellent. If depressing.
