The BBC Edits
-
@George-K, lower right portion of your screenshot:
Update 25 August 2023: an earlier version of this story made reference to details not reported in court and has been updated accordingly.
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
-
@George-K, lower right portion of your screenshot:
Update 25 August 2023: an earlier version of this story made reference to details not reported in court and has been updated accordingly.
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
As opposed to telling the entire story, right?
ETA: That comment, by the way has nothing to do with the details of the case, so, there was no "fact-check" as a matter of ... fact.
-
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
As opposed to telling the entire story, right?
ETA: That comment, by the way has nothing to do with the details of the case, so, there was no "fact-check" as a matter of ... fact.
@George-K said in The BBC Edits:
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
As opposed to telling the entire story, right?
What constitutes the “entire” story? The report makes no mention of the suspect’s family history, medical history, education history, employment history, religious faith or lack thereof, favorite sports and sports teams, ideological and political leanings, gastronomical preferences, musical taste, etc. None of these have been reported with respect to the victims, the arresting officer(s), the prosecutor(s), the judge, etc. What do you think should be reported for you to deem the report the “entire” story?
ETA: That comment, by the way has nothing to do with the details of the case, so, there was no "fact-check" as a matter of ... fact.
Indeed, it looks like the editor wants to limit the article to what has been reported in the court rather than bringing in any additional details that would then need fact-checking.
-
The fact that the pervert is Trans is extremely relevant as pedophilia and trans go together like left Twix and right Twix.
The Brad
-
@George-K said in The BBC Edits:
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
As opposed to telling the entire story, right?
What constitutes the “entire” story? The report makes no mention of the suspect’s family history, medical history, education history, employment history, religious faith or lack thereof, favorite sports and sports teams, ideological and political leanings, gastronomical preferences, musical taste, etc. None of these have been reported with respect to the victims, the arresting officer(s), the prosecutor(s), the judge, etc. What do you think should be reported for you to deem the report the “entire” story?
ETA: That comment, by the way has nothing to do with the details of the case, so, there was no "fact-check" as a matter of ... fact.
Indeed, it looks like the editor wants to limit the article to what has been reported in the court rather than bringing in any additional details that would then need fact-checking.
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
@George-K said in The BBC Edits:
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
As opposed to telling the entire story, right?
What constitutes the “entire” story? The report makes no mention of the suspect’s family history, medical history, education history, employment history, religious faith or lack thereof, favorite sports and sports teams, ideological and political leanings, gastronomical preferences, musical taste, etc.
None of these have been reported with respect to the victims, the arresting officer(s), the prosecutor(s), the judge, etc. What do you think should be reported for you to deem the report the “entire” story?
ETA: That comment, by the way has nothing to do with the details of the case, so, there was no "fact-check" as a matter of ... fact.
Indeed, it looks like the editor wants to limit the article to what has been reported in the court rather than bringing in any additional details that would then need fact-checking.
Please love yourself.
-
The fact that they haven't released the nashville shooter's manifesto is a prominent part of Ramaswamy's campaign.
@Horace said in The BBC Edits:
The fact that they haven't released the nashville shooter's manifesto is a prominent part of Ramaswamy's campaign.
And not a great one, IMO. Doing so just encourages more of the same.
The Brad
-
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
@George-K said in The BBC Edits:
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
As opposed to telling the entire story, right?
What constitutes the “entire” story? The report makes no mention of the suspect’s family history, medical history, education history, employment history, religious faith or lack thereof, favorite sports and sports teams, ideological and political leanings, gastronomical preferences, musical taste, etc.
None of these have been reported with respect to the victims, the arresting officer(s), the prosecutor(s), the judge, etc. What do you think should be reported for you to deem the report the “entire” story?
ETA: That comment, by the way has nothing to do with the details of the case, so, there was no "fact-check" as a matter of ... fact.
Indeed, it looks like the editor wants to limit the article to what has been reported in the court rather than bringing in any additional details that would then need fact-checking.
@Aqua-Letifer said in The BBC Edits:
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
@George-K said in The BBC Edits:
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
As opposed to telling the entire story, right?
What constitutes the “entire” story? The report makes no mention of the suspect’s family history, medical history, education history, employment history, religious faith or lack thereof, favorite sports and sports teams, ideological and political leanings, gastronomical preferences, musical taste, etc.
None of these have been reported with respect to the victims, the arresting officer(s), the prosecutor(s), the judge, etc. What do you think should be reported for you to deem the report the “entire” story?
ETA: That comment, by the way has nothing to do with the details of the case, so, there was no "fact-check" as a matter of ... fact.
Indeed, it looks like the editor wants to limit the article to what has been reported in the court rather than bringing in any additional details that would then need fact-checking.
Excuse me, but where did you see that the fact he was a drag queen did not come up in previous papers cited or during testimony?
-
@Horace said in The BBC Edits:
The fact that they haven't released the nashville shooter's manifesto is a prominent part of Ramaswamy's campaign.
And not a great one, IMO. Doing so just encourages more of the same.
@LuFins-Dad said in The BBC Edits:
@Horace said in The BBC Edits:
The fact that they haven't released the nashville shooter's manifesto is a prominent part of Ramaswamy's campaign.
And not a great one, IMO. Doing so just encourages more of the same.
the issue is the double standard. What are the chances that a white supremacist manifesto would be kept secret?
-
@George-K said in The BBC Edits:
@Axtremus said in The BBC Edits:
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
As opposed to telling the entire story, right?
What constitutes the “entire” story? The report makes no mention of the suspect’s family history, medical history, education history, employment history, religious faith or lack thereof, favorite sports and sports teams, ideological and political leanings, gastronomical preferences, musical taste, etc. None of these have been reported with respect to the victims, the arresting officer(s), the prosecutor(s), the judge, etc. What do you think should be reported for you to deem the report the “entire” story?
ETA: That comment, by the way has nothing to do with the details of the case, so, there was no "fact-check" as a matter of ... fact.
Indeed, it looks like the editor wants to limit the article to what has been reported in the court rather than bringing in any additional details that would then need fact-checking.
-
@George-K, lower right portion of your screenshot:
Update 25 August 2023: an earlier version of this story made reference to details not reported in court and has been updated accordingly.
Looks like the editor wants to stick to publishing only what has been reported in court for that article.
-
Or, just spitballing here, it could be an Orwellian attempt to manipulate the news by excluding facts that don’t fit the established narrative.
-
The fact that the pervert is Trans is extremely relevant as pedophilia and trans go together like left Twix and right Twix.
@LuFins-Dad said in The BBC Edits:
The fact that the pervert is Trans is extremely relevant as pedophilia and trans go together like left Twix and right Twix.
Granted, a little blunt, but true. Much of the Trans movement was created and propelled by pedophiles. I posted a piece the other day about how many gays would love to distance themselves from the T's in LGBQT...
It's the 800 pound (pedophiles)gorilla nobody wants to talk about.
-
Or, just spitballing here, it could be an Orwellian attempt to manipulate the news by excluding facts that don’t fit the established narrative.
