Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Battle of 2033

The Battle of 2033

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
7 Posts 6 Posters 43 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/social-security-checks-face-17-400-cut-without-changes-study/ar-AA1ffOPr?ocid=msedgntp&pc=W129&cvid=972feaed2c1d420ab94051086078718e&ei=25

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Offline
      HoraceH Offline
      Horace
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      The cap doesn't make any sense, and should probably be removed.

      Education is extremely important.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        At the very least it can be raised. But retirement age should be raised slightly as well. It should have been raised 10 years ago.

        The Brad

        CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
        • taiwan_girlT Online
          taiwan_girlT Online
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Agree.

          Wasn't when the US social security started, the benefit age was based on the average life expectancy?

          1 Reply Last reply
          • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

            At the very least it can be raised. But retirement age should be raised slightly as well. It should have been raised 10 years ago.

            CopperC Offline
            CopperC Offline
            Copper
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @LuFins-Dad said in The Battle of 2033:

            It should have been raised 10 years ago.

            It seems like only yesterday, I was surprised to be reminded that it has been 40 years since the age was raised.

            Yes, it should continue to be raised, slowly.

            I have been waiting for age 70 to start collecting, but now I think I'll start at 69 later this year. It seems like I should get it while I can.

            the full retirement age was 65 for most of Social Security's history. The 1983 overhaul of Social Security gradually raised the age to 67, which it reached in 2022 for those born in 1960 or later — effectively cutting benefits by 13 percent as compared to benefits if the retirement age had remained at 65.

            https://www.cbpp.org/research/social-security/raising-social-securitys-retirement-age-would-cut-benefits-for-all-new#:~:text=As noted%2C the full retirement,age had remained at 65.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              The actuaries who work for Social Security are pretty good. Draw your money at 62, 65, 67 or 70. Total monies will be pretty close.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                True that, although in cases where there is an information asymmetry you can probably take advantage of that. For example, if you have always practiced good livin’ and your family lives to 100? Delay it.

                Have you never met a vice you didn’t like and your dad and grandfather died in their 60s? Take it early.

                "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                -Cormac McCarthy

                1 Reply Last reply
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups