You can't post this.
-
@Aqua-Letifer I won't attack what you wrote above at all. I know there is no guarantee regarding YouTube's algorithm, or any platform's algorithm for that matter ... Amazon, Google, Apple, FaceBook, Microsoft, none of them gives any guarantee about how their search or recommendation algorithm would rank any product/content.
So what do you want to do? Is there a specific policy you'd like to propose to deal with the above?
-
@Aqua-Letifer I won't attack what you wrote above at all. I know there is no guarantee regarding YouTube's algorithm, or any platform's algorithm for that matter ... Amazon, Google, Apple, FaceBook, Microsoft, none of them gives any guarantee about how their search or recommendation algorithm would rank any product/content.
So what do you want to do? Is there a specific policy you'd like to propose to deal with the above?
@Axtremus said in You can't post this.:
@Aqua-Letifer I won't attack what you wrote above at all. I know there is no guarantee regarding YouTube's algorithm, or any platform's algorithm for that matter ... Amazon, Google, Apple, FaceBook, Microsoft, none of them gives any guarantee about how their search or recommendation algorithm would rank any product/content.
So what do you want to do? Is there a specific policy you'd like to propose to deal with the above?
There needs to be at least a process within YouTube for dealing with censorship outside of "this video triggered the algorithm in ways we won't explain to you, and no you can't talk to anybody about it." More humans have to get involved for starters. Which means the process would take a lot longer and there'd be a backlog. Good! Only the most egregious stuff should be censored anyway, so severity and number of infractions should dictate what they choose to follow up with.
Really, though, YouTube had its fun, and what we truly need is some competition.
-
I'd definitely be in favour of more transparency and openness from these sites regarding how they handle these things.
@Doctor-Phibes said in You can't post this.:
I'd definitely be in favour of more transparency and openness from these sites regarding how they handle these things.
And that's what most of the content creators went. Just give them some firm rules and don't keep changing the goalposts.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in You can't post this.:
I'd definitely be in favour of more transparency and openness from these sites regarding how they handle these things.
And that's what most of the content creators went. Just give them some firm rules and don't keep changing the goalposts.
@Jolly said in You can't post this.:
@Doctor-Phibes said in You can't post this.:
I'd definitely be in favour of more transparency and openness from these sites regarding how they handle these things.
And that's what most of the content creators went. Just give them some firm rules and don't keep changing the goalposts.
Problem with that is that it is political, to some extent. Companies don't want to have their ads associated with the Bad People of the Month, so they have to move the goalposts necessarily to ensure that.
