Tucker #5

[Jolly]

[xenon]

That was somehow even crappier than I thought it would be.

[Horace]

If the two episodes I've watched had appealed to me, my heart was open to Tucker and his Twitter content. As it is, I don't bother.

[Doctor Phibes]

Did he take his writers with him when he got shit-canned from Fox, or is this a different group, or even him putting it all together himself?

I'm assuming he had a writing team before.

[Jolly]

I think he's got about 9. Writers, producers, all kinds.

[Doctor Phibes]

@Jolly said in Tucker #5:

I think he's got about 9. Writers, producers, all kinds.

Yeah, but are they the same ones as at Fox?

Because his new stuff isn't very good.

IMHO, of course, and I've only seen what's posted here.

[Jolly]

AFAIK.

But his production team at FOX was bigger than 9 guys.

[taiwan_girl]

The number of views for Tucker Carlson's new show on Twitter has dropped by 86% since its launch

What I thought was interesting is how Twitter measures views. For Twitter, video views on Twitter are measured by anyone who watches for more than 2 seconds. LOL

[George K]

@taiwan_girl said in Tucker #5:

For Twitter, video views on Twitter are measured by anyone who watches for more than 2 seconds.

Yup.

Have to admit that I'm surprised that it's so short. I would have been a bit more generous - maybe 15 seconds?

Nevertheless, I believe I commented earlier that Twitter "views" don't necessarily translate into actual "viewings." Does a two-second glimpse translate into any kind of monetization - because it's always about the Benjamins.