Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Chinese “just ran rings around us"

The Chinese “just ran rings around us"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
13 Posts 7 Posters 115 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by Jolly
    #4

    We don't build anything anymore.

    And, as much as it pains me to say it, if we're gonna give the Ukrainians munitions, we need to be damn sure we ain't shorting ourselves. Our production lines should have already been ramped up.

    We've closed Avondale shipyards, and that ain't the only one. Our chip manufacturing capacity is woeful. Our steel manufacturing capacity is beyond awful. Our munitions production couldn't carry us for anything more than a month or two...And I doubt that.

    I don't give a red rat's ass, but this country need to do whatever it takes - and I'm looking at you, tariffs - to get business on board with domestic production. I don't care if we have to go into the trust busting business, tear apart a few large, multinational banks or kick every ass on Wall Street.

    Not to mention, we ain't the world's 911 response center. Other nations need to do their part to counter clear and present dangers to aggression around the world.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor Phibes
      wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
      #5

      As everybody knows I hate to be cynical, but it's very much in the military's interest for the US to do badly in these simulations.

      I was only joking

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Not this badly, though...

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • Doctor PhibesD Offline
          Doctor PhibesD Offline
          Doctor Phibes
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          I remain highly skeptical. Telling the press about how awful the US military is if it's actually awful doesn't really make sense.

          I was only joking

          1 Reply Last reply
          • taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girl
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            I dont know if the war-game takes into account economic factors, which in the war-game above, would be just devastating for mainland China.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by Jolly
              #9

              China just killed almost seven MILLION people without regret or admitting responsibility and the world did nothing. You think they give a rolling red rat's ass about the economical consequences of conquering Taiwan?

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girl
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Yes, I do.

                JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • AxtremusA Offline
                  AxtremusA Offline
                  Axtremus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  "Bad for the country" and "bad for the leader(s)" can be very different things depending on the country and the leader.

                  For dictators, the deterrence need to be "bad for the leader(s)" rather than "bad for the country" to be effective.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                    Yes, I do.

                    JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    @taiwan_girl said in The Chinese “just ran rings around us":

                    Yes, I do.

                    Then I would postulate you are living in denial.

                    The Chinese will worry about the economic consequences of conquering Taiwan just a wee bit more than they worried about tightening the screws on Hong Kong or running one of the largest slavery enterprises on the planet.

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Jolly

                      @taiwan_girl said in The Chinese “just ran rings around us":

                      Yes, I do.

                      Then I would postulate you are living in denial.

                      The Chinese will worry about the economic consequences of conquering Taiwan just a wee bit more than they worried about tightening the screws on Hong Kong or running one of the largest slavery enterprises on the planet.

                      taiwan_girlT Offline
                      taiwan_girlT Offline
                      taiwan_girl
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @Jolly said in The Chinese “just ran rings around us":

                      @taiwan_girl said in The Chinese “just ran rings around us":

                      Yes, I do.

                      Then I would postulate you are living in denial.

                      The Chinese will worry about the economic consequences of conquering Taiwan just a wee bit more than they worried about tightening the screws on Hong Kong or running one of the largest slavery enterprises on the planet.

                      Hmm, HK and the internal slavery issues are just that, internal and quite a bit different than moving into Taiwan. There were no real economic consequences to either of those situations you describe. Using Russia and Ukraine as an example - Russia has been very strong in suppressing and eliminating freedoms internally over the past decade or so. Other countries may dislike and make a statement, but nothing other than that was done. Invasion of Ukraine brought a much different response. I would hope that the world would respond similarly if China attempted the same with Taiwan.

                      I do think that @Axtremus has a good point. The Chinese leadership has not yet moved into the dictatorship role. Yes, at the last 5 year Congress, President Xi definitely consolidated his power, and has surrounded himself with a lot of "yes" men, but I do not think the Chinese leadership is quite at the point of only looking out for themselves as individuals, and have forgotten the consequences upon the country overall. While I may not agree with them, they are not quite to the point of Premier Kim in DPRK, who definitely puts himself above the country.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups