Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Death By Policy

Death By Policy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
12 Posts 6 Posters 138 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Loki
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Measured in years of life lost it gets much more dramatic.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Haven’t clicked the link but how do the authors tease out the difference between treatment avoidance due to fear of the virus vs treatment avoidance because of policy proscriptions?

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      1 Reply Last reply
      • CopperC Offline
        CopperC Offline
        Copper
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Elective death doesn’t sell papers.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          I’ve now read it, they don’t tease it out at all. So ‘death by policy’ is in many - probably most - cases just ‘death by virus’.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
            #6

            I delayed treatment for a chronic condition (immunosuppression) in March and delayed a PFT in April. I’m about to delay another PFT later this month. I delayed lab work by a month.

            It’s conceivable these decisions could have harmed me. Or could still.

            None were because of policy. None were the decisions of any physician. All were my decision trying to balance my own risks as I perceived them.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              I’ve now read it, they don’t tease it out at all. So ‘death by policy’ is in many - probably most - cases just ‘death by virus’.

              George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              @jon-nyc said in Death By Policy:

              I’ve now read it, they don’t tease it out at all. So ‘death by policy’ is in many - probably most - cases just ‘death by virus’.

              You mean death by "fear of virus." as you pointed out in your subsequent post.

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Managing the risk presented by the virus is probably the best description.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins Dad
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Risk of coming into contact with the virus, contracting the virus, and becoming COVID Symptomatic is > Risk of complications by not having these treatments?

                  The Brad

                  CopperC jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                    Risk of coming into contact with the virus, contracting the virus, and becoming COVID Symptomatic is > Risk of complications by not having these treatments?

                    CopperC Offline
                    CopperC Offline
                    Copper
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @LuFins-Dad said in Death By Policy:

                    Risk of coming into contact with the virus, contracting the virus, and becoming COVID Symptomatic is > Risk of complications by not having these treatments?

                    That depends on whether you are buying or selling.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                      Risk of coming into contact with the virus, contracting the virus, and becoming COVID Symptomatic is > Risk of complications by not having these treatments?

                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Death By Policy:

                      Risk of coming into contact with the virus, contracting the virus, and becoming COVID Symptomatic is > Risk of complications by not having these treatments?

                      Weighted by downside potential, yes.

                      Obviously these are not precisely defined risks, but questions of judgement.

                      For example, I was due a quarterly infusion of IVIg in late March. This involves a nurse coming to my home and giving me the infusion for 3+ hours. My nurse is a lovely young lady who also works in a hospital in the Bronx and lives in New Rochelle, then the national hotspot for Covid. I took a pass on that.

                      In late May, I had her come. The situation had changed.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        An alternative question: If there were no lockdown, how many deaths would be caused by a saturation of medical services?

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups