Bribery?

[George K]

[Mik]

wow.

[George K]

"Unclassified documents."

That means there's nothing to prevent them from being released.

But as someone in the RWEC commented, probably nothing will happen.

"I expect the Democrats to circle the wagons, scream racism, hug a transgender 2-year-old, and go enjoy a drag show drinking Bud Light."

[George K]

Didja catch this?

"The DOJ and the FBI appear to have valuable, verifiable information that you have failed to disclose to the American people. Therefore, Congress will proceed to conduct an independent and objective review of this matter, free from those agencies' influence."

How long has the FBI been in possession of these documents? They allegedly date back to Biden's tenure as VEEP, and therefor to Holder/Lynch's time at DOJ.

It will be fascinating to watch the Democrats spin this. If there's been criminal activity, I'm sure the statute of limitations has long passed, so it doesn't matter, right?

[jon-nyc]

So we’re supposed to believe the Trump administration sat on this for four years?

[Mik]

So we’re supposed to believe the swamp critters told them about it?

[Axtremus]

@Mik said in Bribery?:

So we’re supposed to believe the swamp critters told them about it?

Oh well, maybe the Trump administration simply did a piss poor job at swamp draining.

In any case, if the document truly exists, then just publish it and let the process runs it’s course.

[Jolly]

I agree the Trump Administration did a poor job of Swamp draining.

It's a very large Swamp.

But Trump had some very good ideas, such as no longer geographically concentrating power.

[Axtremus]

@Jolly said in Bribery?:

But Trump had some very good ideas, such as no longer geographically concentrating power.

Let’s move some of that power to the states of Washington, Illinois, Vermont or New Hampshire, California, and just to spread some love to the islands, Hawaii too.

[Jolly]

He moved some to Denver, IIRC.

[taiwan_girl]

What is the "swamp". I hear you guys say this a lot but am not sure what it is.

Is it refer to people who have worked in government a long time?

If so, I don't think you want to get rid of experienced people just because they have been there a long time.