Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. v Ronald D. DeSantis

Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. v Ronald D. DeSantis

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
23 Posts 5 Posters 135 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    It won’t get that high.

    The most likely result is by the time this is adjudicated in district court DeSantis will have already dropped out of the 24 race and will have lost interest. Then it will get resolved more or less on Disney’s terms and he won’t bother with an appeal.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • CopperC Copper

      @jon-nyc said in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. v Ronald D. DeSantis:

      There is no room for disagreement

      cute

      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @Copper said in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. v Ronald D. DeSantis:

      @jon-nyc said in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. v Ronald D. DeSantis:

      There is no room for disagreement

      cute

      Normally the disagreement would focus on motive and the cause-and-effect nature of Disney’s speech and the state’s action. But rather helpfully for Disney, DeSantis and the legislature have been proudly bragging about that connection to whomever will listen.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        @Copper said in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. v Ronald D. DeSantis:

        @jon-nyc said in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. v Ronald D. DeSantis:

        There is no room for disagreement

        cute

        Normally the disagreement would focus on motive and the cause-and-effect nature of Disney’s speech and the state’s action. But rather helpfully for Disney, DeSantis and the legislature have been proudly bragging about that connection to whomever will listen.

        HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        @jon-nyc said in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. v Ronald D. DeSantis:

        @Copper said in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. v Ronald D. DeSantis:

        @jon-nyc said in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. v Ronald D. DeSantis:

        There is no room for disagreement

        cute

        Normally the disagreement would focus on motive and the cause-and-effect nature of Disney’s speech and the state’s action. But rather helpfully for Disney, DeSantis and the legislature have been proudly bragging about that connection to whomever will listen.

        Everybody knows DeSantis is smiting an ideology.

        As the culture war becomes indistinguishable from politics, this is how it's done.

        Education is extremely important.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups