Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Warren: "Reform SCOTUS"

Warren: "Reform SCOTUS"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
22 Posts 7 Posters 133 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    There is something unprincipled about “adjusting the relationship” if it’s done to punish political speech, which obviously this was.

    HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @jon-nyc said in Warren: "Reform SCOTUS":

    There is something unprincipled about “adjusting the relationship” if it’s done to punish political speech, which obviously this was.

    When an unprincipled but expedient public/private business relationship runs up against important cultural principles that voters are allowed to care about, then that business relationship can be adjusted, of course within the law. The voters are allowed to pick and choose with whom they do business. They are allowed to vote for politicians who will make those choices on their behalf. They would not be allowed to throw Disney management in prison or sick the IRS on them.

    Education is extremely important.

    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Horace

      @jon-nyc said in Warren: "Reform SCOTUS":

      There is something unprincipled about “adjusting the relationship” if it’s done to punish political speech, which obviously this was.

      When an unprincipled but expedient public/private business relationship runs up against important cultural principles that voters are allowed to care about, then that business relationship can be adjusted, of course within the law. The voters are allowed to pick and choose with whom they do business. They are allowed to vote for politicians who will make those choices on their behalf. They would not be allowed to throw Disney management in prison or sick the IRS on them.

      JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @Horace said in Warren: "Reform SCOTUS":

      @jon-nyc said in Warren: "Reform SCOTUS":

      There is something unprincipled about “adjusting the relationship” if it’s done to punish political speech, which obviously this was.

      When an unprincipled but expedient public/private business relationship runs up against important cultural principles that voters are allowed to care about, then that business relationship can be adjusted, of course within the law. The voters are allowed to pick and choose with whom they do business. They are allowed to vote for politicians who will make those choices on their behalf. They would not be allowed to throw Disney management in prison or sick the IRS on them.

      No, only the Biden Justice Department can do the latter,

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Users
      • Groups