Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans
-
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 01:23 last edited by
@George-K said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
So, they released this guy's manifesto.
Did they? Its Federalist article cites the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail claims they uncovered the manifesto, but without actually showing the manifesto. Maybe I missed it, but if the manifesto really is shown, please provide a link to it. As it is, I would not put too much credence into the Daily Mail’s claim.
-
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 01:45 last edited by
As usual, you don't address the gist of the article.
Consistency, I guess...
-
@George-K said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
So, they released this guy's manifesto.
Did they? Its Federalist article cites the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail claims they uncovered the manifesto, but without actually showing the manifesto. Maybe I missed it, but if the manifesto really is shown, please provide a link to it. As it is, I would not put too much credence into the Daily Mail’s claim.
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 01:46 last edited by@Axtremus said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
The Daily Mail claims they uncovered the manifesto, but without actually showing the manifesto.
I don't have a link for that - relying on @jolly 's link.
Do you think that the so-called "manifestos" of these murderers should be public information?
If not, why not?
If the Mail is being truthful, do you care to speculate why the Nashville murderer's writings are not public information - a month later.
Do you have reason to believe that The Daily Mail is just making stuff up?
-
@George-K said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
So, they released this guy's manifesto.
Did they? Its Federalist article cites the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail claims they uncovered the manifesto, but without actually showing the manifesto. Maybe I missed it, but if the manifesto really is shown, please provide a link to it. As it is, I would not put too much credence into the Daily Mail’s claim.
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 01:47 last edited by@Axtremus said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
The Daily Mail claims they uncovered the manifesto, but without actually showing the manifesto.
Anand....
51 "Intelligence" experts claimed that the Biden laptop had all the "hallmarks Russian disinformation" without citing what those hallmarks were.
-
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 02:28 last edited by
If Ax doesn't like one source, let's try another...
-
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 02:30 last edited by
Now, this one does riff from the Daily Mail...
https://nypost.com/2023/04/20/louisville-bank-shooter-connor-sturgeon-left-manifesto/
-
@Axtremus said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
The Daily Mail claims they uncovered the manifesto, but without actually showing the manifesto.
I don't have a link for that - relying on @jolly 's link.
Do you think that the so-called "manifestos" of these murderers should be public information?
If not, why not?
If the Mail is being truthful, do you care to speculate why the Nashville murderer's writings are not public information - a month later.
Do you have reason to believe that The Daily Mail is just making stuff up?
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 03:18 last edited by@George-K said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
Do you have reason to believe that The Daily Mail is just making stuff up?
My God, say it isn't so.
-
@George-K said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
Do you have reason to believe that The Daily Mail is just making stuff up?
My God, say it isn't so.
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 04:18 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
@George-K said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
Do you have reason to believe that The Daily Mail is just making stuff up?
My God, say it isn't so.
Thanks @Doctor-Phibes ... I was about to ask @George-K to consult you on the credibility of the Daily Mail.
-
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 11:20 last edited by
Again, notice no response to the gist of the article.
-
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 11:23 last edited by
@Jolly said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
Again, notice no response to the gist of the article.
Stepping aside from whether The Mail's story is accurate, perhaps a better question would be, "Why hasn't it been released?"
As long as we're speculating about the Mail's credibility, care to speculate on that?
-
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 12:16 last edited by
@Jolly said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
Again, notice no response to the gist of the article.
Well, if true, it just shows how crazy people get. The fact that in this case he's crazy about gun control is somewhat irrelevant. The key words aren't 'gun control', but 'crazy'.
The fact that politicians should cynically exploit something isn't exactly surprising. It's what they do.
-
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 13:32 last edited by
-
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 15:22 last edited by
@George-K said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans:
Denied:
I'm guessing one of two things:
- There is something in there detrimental to the community or to the school...Something like an unproven allegation.
- There's some weird transgender stuff in there and the Democrat administration of teh city doesn't want to feed the Trans=Mental problems equation.