Twitter pisses off NPR
-
wrote on 12 Apr 2023, 14:44 last edited by
find other ways to find our work
Fucking really?
-
wrote on 12 Apr 2023, 14:53 last edited by
The BBC has also complained about the state funded description, however Musk complimented them on the quality of their reporting, which might soften the pill a little.
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65226481
Calling the BBC state-funded isn't really accurate, as the article explains, however they're not primarily a commercial organisation.
-
wrote on 12 Apr 2023, 17:53 last edited by
Seen on the RWEC:
"The platform isn’t undermining NPR’s credibility. They do a fine job of that themselves. If they wanted to demonstrate independence, they could simply refuse to take federal subsidies, especially since NPR keeps insisting that it’s only “less than 1%” of their operating budget. And maybe they could start building credibility by reporting on stories rather than burying them."
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 14:20 last edited by
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 21:44 last edited by
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 22:14 last edited by
CBC is a decent TV and radio news source. Like the BBC in Britain, it is funded by tax dollars. No dispute there. It also has an admitted centre left bias in its reporting. It does not however kow-tow to the ruling government or any particular political party whether federal or provincial. Its public affairs reporting on national matters is miles ahead of its privately owned competitors - CTV and Global.
To place it in the same league as state owned and controlled media as in Russia and China is both absurd and ridiculous.
-
CBC is a decent TV and radio news source. Like the BBC in Britain, it is funded by tax dollars. No dispute there. It also has an admitted centre left bias in its reporting. It does not however kow-tow to the ruling government or any particular political party whether federal or provincial. Its public affairs reporting on national matters is miles ahead of its privately owned competitors - CTV and Global.
To place it in the same league as state owned and controlled media as in Russia and China is both absurd and ridiculous.
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 22:22 last edited by@Renauda said in Twitter pisses off NPR:
To place it in the same league as state owned and controlled media as in Russia and China is both absurd and ridiculous.
I have not done that. However, for the CBC to be offended by...the truth about where their funding comes from is ridiculous. In fact, one might stretch it a bit and say dishonest - like the graph on their website.
And that sneaky little tilde confirms the fact that they want to deceive.
Here's what an accurate graph looks like.
I don't dispute the accuracy of their reporting, however, the hissy fit that CBC is having ("I'm taking my ball and going home because you hurt my feelings by telling the truth.") is pathetic and unbecoming to a "serious" news organization.
-
@Renauda said in Twitter pisses off NPR:
To place it in the same league as state owned and controlled media as in Russia and China is both absurd and ridiculous.
I have not done that. However, for the CBC to be offended by...the truth about where their funding comes from is ridiculous. In fact, one might stretch it a bit and say dishonest - like the graph on their website.
And that sneaky little tilde confirms the fact that they want to deceive.
Here's what an accurate graph looks like.
I don't dispute the accuracy of their reporting, however, the hissy fit that CBC is having ("I'm taking my ball and going home because you hurt my feelings by telling the truth.") is pathetic and unbecoming to a "serious" news organization.
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 22:24 last edited by jon-nyc@George-K said in Twitter pisses off NPR:
@Renauda said in Twitter pisses off NPR:
To place it in the same league as state owned and controlled media as in Russia and China is both absurd and ridiculous.
I have not done that.
But Twitter sort of is. And it’s not hard to see who the main beneficiaries of that are.
-
@Renauda said in Twitter pisses off NPR:
To place it in the same league as state owned and controlled media as in Russia and China is both absurd and ridiculous.
I have not done that. However, for the CBC to be offended by...the truth about where their funding comes from is ridiculous. In fact, one might stretch it a bit and say dishonest - like the graph on their website.
And that sneaky little tilde confirms the fact that they want to deceive.
Here's what an accurate graph looks like.
I don't dispute the accuracy of their reporting, however, the hissy fit that CBC is having ("I'm taking my ball and going home because you hurt my feelings by telling the truth.") is pathetic and unbecoming to a "serious" news organization.
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 23:03 last edited by RenaudaIt’s government funded in a similar, although not identical, way the BBC is government funded. Twitter for some reason gives the BBC a pass on the issue. Why is that?
As for the clip of Trudeau and what he says about Poilievre and the Federal Tories….Trudeau is right. The Conservatives are hell bent on shutting down the CBC and all its affiliates. I oppose this Tory policy which really only panders to a small minority of western anglophone Canadians who, for the most part, reside in rural Alberta and Saskatchewan and continue to believe that the metric system is a Bonapartist plot to retake Canada from the Hudson’s Bay Company.
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 00:31 last edited by
So, how is a government subsidy different? Because a subsidy is not supposed to be "on going" but is more of a one time thing?
Or, is a subsidy also government funding but under a different name?
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 13:49 last edited by
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 14:54 last edited by Renauda
Indeed it is. It also has, as the Twatter link you provided crudely pointed out, drama, comedy and sports programming along with arts and science documentary productions. Best of all, it broadcasts throughout the country in both official languages, French and English.
It is produced by Canadians for Canadians. I support the CBC and regard it a treasured national cultural institution. I would willingly defend it with extreme prejudice.
More:
-
wrote on 21 Apr 2023, 19:12 last edited by
-
wrote on 21 Apr 2023, 21:47 last edited by Doctor Phibes
I'd go so far as to humbly suggest that Elon Musk is not to be trusted.
-
I'd go so far as to humbly suggest that Elon Musk is not to be trusted.
wrote on 21 Apr 2023, 21:55 last edited by -
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 06:22 last edited by
He is turning into a caricature. He is obviously a smart guy, but I think is starting to love publicity about himself a bit too much.
-
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 11:19 last edited by
He's a promoter. They like publicity.
But back to the subject at hand...What is Musk's ultimate goal here? You know he has one.
-
He's a promoter. They like publicity.
But back to the subject at hand...What is Musk's ultimate goal here? You know he has one.
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 11:36 last edited by@Jolly said in Twitter pisses off NPR:
He's a promoter. They like publicity.
But back to the subject at hand...What is Musk's ultimate goal here? You know he has one.
- It's fun to make the papers due to bullshit
- Data mining
-
He's a promoter. They like publicity.
But back to the subject at hand...What is Musk's ultimate goal here? You know he has one.
wrote on 22 Apr 2023, 12:18 last edited by@Jolly said in Twitter pisses off NPR:
What is Musk's ultimate goal here? You know he has one.
Money.
And with any luck to spend it to go and live on Mars.
