34 Counts of falsifying business records
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 19:45 last edited by
With conspiracy to affect the 2016 election, which is what made them felonies.
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 19:52 last edited by
It ain't gonna stick.
And if Lindsey Graham is right about Georgia, the Dems just put Donald J. Trump back into the Whitehouse.
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 20:21 last edited by LuFins Dad 4 Apr 2023, 20:29
@Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
With conspiracy to affect the 2016 election, which is what made them felonies.
They cannot try campaign violations. That’s a Federal Charge and the Justice Department refused to prosecute. Without a conviction of campaign violations, he is presumed innocent. There is no felony that they can tie the misdemeanor charge to.
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 20:23 last edited by
They cannot try federal campaign violations. If there was an applicable NY statute they could.
But I tend to agree with you that this is weak.
-
They cannot try federal campaign violations. If there was an applicable NY statute they could.
But I tend to agree with you that this is weak.
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 20:55 last edited by@Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
But I tend to agree with you that this is weak.
-
They cannot try federal campaign violations. If there was an applicable NY statute they could.
But I tend to agree with you that this is weak.
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 21:02 last edited by@Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
They cannot try federal campaign violations. If there was an applicable NY statute they could.
But I tend to agree with you that this is weak.
The one thing I was wondering was if they could charge him with a State Campaign Finance Violation and if it was Felony. They didn’t. The felony that they are referring to is an unproven allegation on their part that by its nature CAN NOT be proven and tried by them. The Judge must dismiss based on that alone.
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 21:03 last edited by
And quite frankly, I would personally like for one of these charges to actually be true and remove him from consideration for the nomination.
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 21:06 last edited by
The next hearing is Dec. 4. Judge insists that Trump be there in person, whereas, as a matter of fact, this hearing is all on pre-trial motions. It's unusual for the defendant to be present for such a hearing.
The judge (who's daughter works for Biden/Harris) insists that Trump be there.
-
And quite frankly, I would personally like for one of these charges to actually be true and remove him from consideration for the nomination.
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 21:07 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
And quite frankly, I would personally like for one of these charges to actually be true and remove him from consideration for the nomination.
It wouldn't even if it were true.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
And quite frankly, I would personally like for one of these charges to actually be true and remove him from consideration for the nomination.
It wouldn't even if it were true.
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 21:18 last edited by@Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
@LuFins-Dad said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
And quite frankly, I would personally like for one of these charges to actually be true and remove him from consideration for the nomination.
It wouldn't even if it were true.
The indictment wouldn’t, but I’m not sure he could run for President from jail if he was convicted…
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 21:19 last edited by
I believe he could.
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 21:29 last edited by LuFins Dad 4 Apr 2023, 21:31
@Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
I believe he could.
Ok… Could he serve if he was still in jail? This charge is BS, but if there is any evidence that he actively tried to put out false electors, that could be quite problematic.
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 21:39 last edited by
I'm beginning to think this thin case is nothing but a delaying tactic for political reasons.
-
@Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
I believe he could.
Ok… Could he serve if he was still in jail? This charge is BS, but if there is any evidence that he actively tried to put out false electors, that could be quite problematic.
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 21:40 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
Could he serve if he was still in jail?
Could he then pardon himself?
-
I'm beginning to think this thin case is nothing but a delaying tactic for political reasons.
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 21:50 last edited by@Jolly said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:
I'm beginning to think this thin case is nothing but a delaying tactic for political reasons.
Yup. He has to appear in court, 8 months from now, for pre-trial motions.
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 22:02 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 22:47 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 23:13 last edited by
He is going to convict Mr. Trump for committing unspecified crimes.
Wow.
The democrat machine will back him up 100%.
Is this a great country or what?
-
wrote on 4 Apr 2023, 23:19 last edited by
In other news, a new world record was achieved this afternoon as 37% of the US population simultaneously masturbated…