Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. 34 Counts of falsifying business records

34 Counts of falsifying business records

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
49 Posts 11 Posters 543 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    It ain't gonna stick.

    And if Lindsey Graham is right about Georgia, the Dems just put Donald J. Trump back into the Whitehouse.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Mik

      With conspiracy to affect the 2016 election, which is what made them felonies.

      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by LuFins Dad
      #3

      @Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

      With conspiracy to affect the 2016 election, which is what made them felonies.

      They cannot try campaign violations. That’s a Federal Charge and the Justice Department refused to prosecute. Without a conviction of campaign violations, he is presumed innocent. There is no felony that they can tie the misdemeanor charge to.

      The Brad

      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Offline
        MikM Offline
        Mik
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        They cannot try federal campaign violations. If there was an applicable NY statute they could.

        But I tend to agree with you that this is weak.

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        George KG LuFins DadL Catseye3C 3 Replies Last reply
        • MikM Mik

          They cannot try federal campaign violations. If there was an applicable NY statute they could.

          But I tend to agree with you that this is weak.

          George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          @Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

          But I tend to agree with you that this is weak.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Mik

            They cannot try federal campaign violations. If there was an applicable NY statute they could.

            But I tend to agree with you that this is weak.

            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins Dad
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

            They cannot try federal campaign violations. If there was an applicable NY statute they could.

            But I tend to agree with you that this is weak.

            The one thing I was wondering was if they could charge him with a State Campaign Finance Violation and if it was Felony. They didn’t. The felony that they are referring to is an unproven allegation on their part that by its nature CAN NOT be proven and tried by them. The Judge must dismiss based on that alone.

            The Brad

            1 Reply Last reply
            • LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              And quite frankly, I would personally like for one of these charges to actually be true and remove him from consideration for the nomination.

              The Brad

              MikM 1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                The next hearing is Dec. 4. Judge insists that Trump be there in person, whereas, as a matter of fact, this hearing is all on pre-trial motions. It's unusual for the defendant to be present for such a hearing.

                The judge (who's daughter works for Biden/Harris) insists that Trump be there.

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                  And quite frankly, I would personally like for one of these charges to actually be true and remove him from consideration for the nomination.

                  MikM Offline
                  MikM Offline
                  Mik
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @LuFins-Dad said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

                  And quite frankly, I would personally like for one of these charges to actually be true and remove him from consideration for the nomination.

                  It wouldn't even if it were true.

                  “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Mik

                    @LuFins-Dad said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

                    And quite frankly, I would personally like for one of these charges to actually be true and remove him from consideration for the nomination.

                    It wouldn't even if it were true.

                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

                    @LuFins-Dad said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

                    And quite frankly, I would personally like for one of these charges to actually be true and remove him from consideration for the nomination.

                    It wouldn't even if it were true.

                    The indictment wouldn’t, but I’m not sure he could run for President from jail if he was convicted…

                    The Brad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Offline
                      MikM Offline
                      Mik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      I believe he could.

                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                      • MikM Mik

                        I believe he could.

                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins Dad
                        wrote on last edited by LuFins Dad
                        #12

                        @Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

                        I believe he could.

                        Ok… Could he serve if he was still in jail? This charge is BS, but if there is any evidence that he actively tried to put out false electors, that could be quite problematic.

                        The Brad

                        CopperC jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
                        • LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins Dad
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/3921605-can-a-candidate-run-for-president-while-in-jail/

                          The Brad

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • JollyJ Offline
                            JollyJ Offline
                            Jolly
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            I'm beginning to think this thin case is nothing but a delaying tactic for political reasons.

                            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                            George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                            • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                              @Mik said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

                              I believe he could.

                              Ok… Could he serve if he was still in jail? This charge is BS, but if there is any evidence that he actively tried to put out false electors, that could be quite problematic.

                              CopperC Offline
                              CopperC Offline
                              Copper
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              @LuFins-Dad said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

                              Could he serve if he was still in jail?

                              Could he then pardon himself?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • JollyJ Jolly

                                I'm beginning to think this thin case is nothing but a delaying tactic for political reasons.

                                George KG Offline
                                George KG Offline
                                George K
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                @Jolly said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

                                I'm beginning to think this thin case is nothing but a delaying tactic for political reasons.

                                Yup. He has to appear in court, 8 months from now, for pre-trial motions.

                                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • George KG Offline
                                  George KG Offline
                                  George K
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Sez the guy who reduced 52% of felony arrests to misdemeanors.

                                  "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                  The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • George KG Offline
                                    George KG Offline
                                    George K
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • CopperC Offline
                                      CopperC Offline
                                      Copper
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      He is going to convict Mr. Trump for committing unspecified crimes.

                                      Wow.

                                      The democrat machine will back him up 100%.

                                      Is this a great country or what?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins Dad
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        In other news, a new world record was achieved this afternoon as 37% of the US population simultaneously masturbated…

                                        The Brad

                                        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                          In other news, a new world record was achieved this afternoon as 37% of the US population simultaneously masturbated…

                                          JollyJ Offline
                                          JollyJ Offline
                                          Jolly
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @LuFins-Dad said in 34 Counts of falsifying business records:

                                          In other news, a new world record was achieved this afternoon as 37% of the US population simultaneously masturbated…

                                          Or, as Bongino said today, at least 25% of the country would have cheered mightily for one lousy RPG.

                                          I'm sorry, but there are a helluva lot more truly despicable low-lifes on the Left than on the Right. As one Leftist who attended CPAC said, "I was shocked at how nice I was treated by almost everybody. Many people invited me into their group meetings, because they wanted a vigorous debate with me".

                                          Try that at the Democrat equivalent and see what happens...They hate hard.

                                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups