Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Do bailouts help or hurt?

Do bailouts help or hurt?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
13 Posts 7 Posters 71 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    I think there’s some availability bias going on here. We’ve had almost 400 bank failures since 2010 - IOW after the financial crisis. They didn’t make the news.

    Also I don’t see the moral hazard argument here. No bank will look and say “we can take this risk, it worked out okay at SVB.” They did in fact let SVB fail, as distinct from Bear Stearns in 2007.

    Is there moral hazard created for depositors? I suppose, but as Bill Ackman pointed out, he’s a pretty sophisticated investor and he finds banks a black box, despite the thousands of pages of financial reports they have to publish.

    So I don’t think it’s realistic to rely on depositors to keep banks risk in check. I suppose we could be more vigilant about encouraging depositors to split their cash deposits between multiple banks to stay under the limit with each (which is what my foundation does). But that is the functional equivalent of the fdic insuring all deposits.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      I don't think many people want their deposits spread across a lot of banks, although I would do that if I ever kept over 250K in a bank.

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        We use Credit Unions. I have always been leery about whether the NCUA actually has as much backing as the FDIC, though.

        The Brad

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          I think there’s some availability bias going on here. We’ve had almost 400 bank failures since 2010 - IOW after the financial crisis. They didn’t make the news.

          Also I don’t see the moral hazard argument here. No bank will look and say “we can take this risk, it worked out okay at SVB.” They did in fact let SVB fail, as distinct from Bear Stearns in 2007.

          Is there moral hazard created for depositors? I suppose, but as Bill Ackman pointed out, he’s a pretty sophisticated investor and he finds banks a black box, despite the thousands of pages of financial reports they have to publish.

          So I don’t think it’s realistic to rely on depositors to keep banks risk in check. I suppose we could be more vigilant about encouraging depositors to split their cash deposits between multiple banks to stay under the limit with each (which is what my foundation does). But that is the functional equivalent of the fdic insuring all deposits.

          AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote on last edited by Axtremus
          #7

          @jon-nyc said in Do bailouts help or hurt?:

          So I don’t think it’s realistic to rely on depositors to keep banks risk in check. I suppose we could be more vigilant about encouraging depositors to split their cash deposits between multiple banks to stay under the limit with each (which is what my foundation does). But that is the functional equivalent of the fdic insuring all deposits.

          +1. I wonder if it would be worthwhile to structure things such that the larger depositors shoulder disproportionately more of the cost to insure the deposits. That would also encourage larger depositors to spread their deposits into smaller chunks across more banks.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • Doctor PhibesD Offline
            Doctor PhibesD Offline
            Doctor Phibes
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            @Mik said in Do bailouts help or hurt?:

            I don't think many people want their deposits spread across a lot of banks, although I would do that if I ever kept over 250K in a bank.

            I was totally unaware of the 250K limit. Obviously, this kind of thing doesn't normally affect me, but for a few short, blissful days during the house move it would have done. Imagine the calamity that could have occurred if there'd been a run on Santander and I couldn't get hold of the money to pay off the new mortgage!

            I was only joking

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Mik

              I don't think many people want their deposits spread across a lot of banks, although I would do that if I ever kept over 250K in a bank.

              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              @Mik said in Do bailouts help or hurt?:

              I don't think many people want their deposits spread across a lot of banks, although I would do that if I ever kept over 250K in a bank.

              I consulted for a startup in the early aughts that made it seamless. You put the money in one participating bank and it opened accounts for you in other participating banks.

              Our foundation uses Merrill which either uses that service or a clone.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Offline
                MikM Offline
                Mik
                wrote on last edited by Mik
                #10

                Yes, but for a business to run that way adds an extra level of complexity. I already run one of my charities in one bank and one credit union. It presents some challenges from time to time.

                A business with many transactions and requiring careful cash flow control could run into problems.

                “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                1 Reply Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                  @Mik said in Do bailouts help or hurt?:

                  I don't think many people want their deposits spread across a lot of banks, although I would do that if I ever kept over 250K in a bank.

                  I was totally unaware of the 250K limit. Obviously, this kind of thing doesn't normally affect me, but for a few short, blissful days during the house move it would have done. Imagine the calamity that could have occurred if there'd been a run on Santander and I couldn't get hold of the money to pay off the new mortgage!

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @Doctor-Phibes said in Do bailouts help or hurt?:

                  @Mik said in Do bailouts help or hurt?:

                  I don't think many people want their deposits spread across a lot of banks, although I would do that if I ever kept over 250K in a bank.
                  

                  I was totally unaware of the 250K limit. Obviously, this kind of thing doesn't normally affect me, but for a few short, blissful days during the house move it would have done. Imagine the calamity that could have occurred if there'd been a run on Santander and I couldn't get hold of the money to pay off the new mortgage!

                  For a couple, it's my understanding you can do multiple accounts, depending on how they're opened...One for him, one for her, a joint account, etc.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Offline
                    HoraceH Offline
                    Horace
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    A brokerage will allow you to open multiple individual accounts. Seems like way too much hassle though. If Schwab or ETrade went belly up and everybody's accounts were decapitated after 250k, I suppose it'd be a bigger deal than 2008 or you name it. I think the government would do whatever to make people whole.

                    Education is extremely important.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Jolly

                      @Doctor-Phibes said in Do bailouts help or hurt?:

                      @Mik said in Do bailouts help or hurt?:

                      I don't think many people want their deposits spread across a lot of banks, although I would do that if I ever kept over 250K in a bank.
                      

                      I was totally unaware of the 250K limit. Obviously, this kind of thing doesn't normally affect me, but for a few short, blissful days during the house move it would have done. Imagine the calamity that could have occurred if there'd been a run on Santander and I couldn't get hold of the money to pay off the new mortgage!

                      For a couple, it's my understanding you can do multiple accounts, depending on how they're opened...One for him, one for her, a joint account, etc.

                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @Jolly Yep.

                      A couple could get $1M insured at one bank that way.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups