Throw the baby over the fence.
-
Now, y'all tell me again why I should give these fools three hots and a cot for the rest of their lives?
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
The piece says the hit was gang related. I'll go farther...I'm going to guess this is cartel related. Killing family members, all the way down to innocent babies, has all the hallmarks of a cartel killing.
Right now, jockeying is going on in California between the various cartels for the drug trade.
-
Now, y'all tell me again why I should give these fools three hots and a cot for the rest of their lives?
@Jolly said in Throw the baby over the fence.:
Now, y'all tell me again why I should give these fools three hots and a cot for the rest of their lives?
Because society should be more civil than the animals? If it can't in practice be more humane than its most barbaric members, what the fuck is the point?
-
For what it costs each year to feed and house those two animals, I could send two deserving poor kids to college.
Every four years.
I'd rather send the deserving to school, feed the hungry, house the homeless or a jillion other things.
Let's try them, convict them, and kill them. It's the best use of resources.
-
For what it costs each year to feed and house those two animals, I could send two deserving poor kids to college.
Every four years.
I'd rather send the deserving to school, feed the hungry, house the homeless or a jillion other things.
Let's try them, convict them, and kill them. It's the best use of resources.
@Jolly said in Throw the baby over the fence.:
For what it costs each year to feed and house those two animals, I could send two deserving poor kids to college.
Every four years.
I'd rather send the deserving to school, feed the hungry, house the homeless or a jillion other things.
Let's try them, convict them, and kill them. It's the best use of resources.
Sorry, no. Stories like these are the easy ones. You don't set life-and-death policies based on the most obvious cases.
-
The obvious cases are the easy cases. When you have a cancer on the body, you cut it out. Animals like these are a cancer on the societal body.
You can't ever turn these killers free. So give them a fair trial, let them appeal the verdict if they wish and if they are guilty beyond doubt, execute them.
That's not vengeance, that's simple justice.
Look at this from a different perspective...You are gone to work and your home is invaded by a couple of strung out losers intent on thievery and murder. Your wife grabs your child and runs, only to be dragged down, raped and stabbed to death. Not wanting to leave any witnesses, they cut your child's throat and laugh as the body twitches and heaves. You come home to find your world destroyed and much of what you love sprawled on the floor in dark pools of congealing blood.
This horrific crime is all caught on the house surveillance cameras and the police have the perps in custody within 24 hours.
At trial, there is no doubt of guilt. It is irrefutable that these two men are the murderers.
So, what is justice? To allow two animals such as these a life of incarceration? To know that what you love and hold dear, is gone from this earthly world forever, while these two fools' biggest worry is what the prison is cooking for supper? To clothe, feed and shelter them with mine and yours tax dollars, monies that could be spent for good, not for the continuance of Evil?
Nay. Justice would demand their lives be forfeit. Execute them and be done with it. Rats do not understand nuance nor should they be availed of it.
-
The obvious cases are the easy cases. When you have a cancer on the body, you cut it out. Animals like these are a cancer on the societal body.
You can't ever turn these killers free. So give them a fair trial, let them appeal the verdict if they wish and if they are guilty beyond doubt, execute them.
That's not vengeance, that's simple justice.
Look at this from a different perspective...You are gone to work and your home is invaded by a couple of strung out losers intent on thievery and murder. Your wife grabs your child and runs, only to be dragged down, raped and stabbed to death. Not wanting to leave any witnesses, they cut your child's throat and laugh as the body twitches and heaves. You come home to find your world destroyed and much of what you love sprawled on the floor in dark pools of congealing blood.
This horrific crime is all caught on the house surveillance cameras and the police have the perps in custody within 24 hours.
At trial, there is no doubt of guilt. It is irrefutable that these two men are the murderers.
So, what is justice? To allow two animals such as these a life of incarceration? To know that what you love and hold dear, is gone from this earthly world forever, while these two fools' biggest worry is what the prison is cooking for supper? To clothe, feed and shelter them with mine and yours tax dollars, monies that could be spent for good, not for the continuance of Evil?
Nay. Justice would demand their lives be forfeit. Execute them and be done with it. Rats do not understand nuance nor should they be availed of it.
@Jolly said in Throw the baby over the fence.:
The obvious cases are the easy cases. When you have a cancer on the body, you cut it out. Animals like these are a cancer on the societal body.
You can't ever turn these killers free. So give them a fair trial, let them appeal the verdict if they wish and if they are guilty beyond doubt, execute them.
That's not vengeance, that's simple justice.
Look at this from a different perspective...You are gone to work and your home is invaded by a couple of strung out losers intent on thievery and murder. Your wife grabs your child and runs, only to be dragged down, raped and stabbed to death. Not wanting to leave any witnesses, they cut your child's throat and laugh as the body twitches and heaves. You come home to find your world destroyed and much of what you love sprawled on the floor in dark pools of congealing blood.
This horrific crime is all caught on the house surveillance cameras and the police have the perps in custody within 24 hours.
At trial, there is no doubt of guilt. It is irrefutable that these two men are the murderers.
So, what is justice? To allow two animals such as these a life of incarceration? To know that what you love and hold dear, is gone from this earthly world forever, while these two fools' biggest worry is what the prison is cooking for supper? To clothe, feed and shelter them with mine and yours tax dollars, monies that could be spent for good, not for the continuance of Evil?
Nay. Justice would demand their lives be forfeit. Execute them and be done with it. Rats do not understand nuance nor should they be availed of it.
Your whole thing with the liberal woke nonsense is, "it allows my side to justify going lower," which is exactly the same thing. I don't want civil codes to be set by the worst of us, sorry.
The entire point of not executing them is that not doing so is better than they deserve.
-
@Jolly said in Throw the baby over the fence.:
The obvious cases are the easy cases. When you have a cancer on the body, you cut it out. Animals like these are a cancer on the societal body.
You can't ever turn these killers free. So give them a fair trial, let them appeal the verdict if they wish and if they are guilty beyond doubt, execute them.
That's not vengeance, that's simple justice.
Look at this from a different perspective...You are gone to work and your home is invaded by a couple of strung out losers intent on thievery and murder. Your wife grabs your child and runs, only to be dragged down, raped and stabbed to death. Not wanting to leave any witnesses, they cut your child's throat and laugh as the body twitches and heaves. You come home to find your world destroyed and much of what you love sprawled on the floor in dark pools of congealing blood.
This horrific crime is all caught on the house surveillance cameras and the police have the perps in custody within 24 hours.
At trial, there is no doubt of guilt. It is irrefutable that these two men are the murderers.
So, what is justice? To allow two animals such as these a life of incarceration? To know that what you love and hold dear, is gone from this earthly world forever, while these two fools' biggest worry is what the prison is cooking for supper? To clothe, feed and shelter them with mine and yours tax dollars, monies that could be spent for good, not for the continuance of Evil?
Nay. Justice would demand their lives be forfeit. Execute them and be done with it. Rats do not understand nuance nor should they be availed of it.
Your whole thing with the liberal woke nonsense is, "it allows my side to justify going lower," which is exactly the same thing. I don't want civil codes to be set by the worst of us, sorry.
The entire point of not executing them is that not doing so is better than they deserve.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Throw the baby over the fence.:
@Jolly said in Throw the baby over the fence.:
The obvious cases are the easy cases. When you have a cancer on the body, you cut it out. Animals like these are a cancer on the societal body.
You can't ever turn these killers free. So give them a fair trial, let them appeal the verdict if they wish and if they are guilty beyond doubt, execute them.
That's not vengeance, that's simple justice.
Look at this from a different perspective...You are gone to work and your home is invaded by a couple of strung out losers intent on thievery and murder. Your wife grabs your child and runs, only to be dragged down, raped and stabbed to death. Not wanting to leave any witnesses, they cut your child's throat and laugh as the body twitches and heaves. You come home to find your world destroyed and much of what you love sprawled on the floor in dark pools of congealing blood.
This horrific crime is all caught on the house surveillance cameras and the police have the perps in custody within 24 hours.
At trial, there is no doubt of guilt. It is irrefutable that these two men are the murderers.
So, what is justice? To allow two animals such as these a life of incarceration? To know that what you love and hold dear, is gone from this earthly world forever, while these two fools' biggest worry is what the prison is cooking for supper? To clothe, feed and shelter them with mine and yours tax dollars, monies that could be spent for good, not for the continuance of Evil?
Nay. Justice would demand their lives be forfeit. Execute them and be done with it. Rats do not understand nuance nor should they be availed of it.
Your whole thing with the liberal woke nonsense is, "it allows my side to justify going lower," which is exactly the same thing. I don't want civil codes to be set by the worst of us, sorry.
The entire point of not executing them is that not doing so is better than they deserve.
Lad, a chaplain and a shot at deathbed repentance is more than kind.
Note that Jesus told the thief on the cross that he would go to paradise based on his belief, but the Son of Man did not bother to take the thief down from the cross.
