Challenger
-
@Jolly said in Challenger:
Should they?
I don't see why not. If they're British just don't try starting them on a cold, damp morning.
-
@Jolly said in Challenger:
Should they?
I don't see why not. If they're British just don't try starting them on a cold, damp morning.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Challenger:
@Jolly said in Challenger:
Should they?
I don't see why not. If they're British just don't try starting them on a cold, damp morning.
You'd think that, being British, that would be the very first engineering problem to solve.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Challenger:
@Jolly said in Challenger:
Should they?
I don't see why not. If they're British just don't try starting them on a cold, damp morning.
You'd think that, being British, that would be the very first engineering problem to solve.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Challenger:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Challenger:
@Jolly said in Challenger:
Should they?
I don't see why not. If they're British just don't try starting them on a cold, damp morning.
You'd think that, being British, that would be the very first engineering problem to solve.
Famed Australian commentator Clive James once said that the British labour under the delusion that they live in a tropical climate, and they design everything, from suitcases to houses to cars accordingly.
-
-
Tucker's not going to like this at all.
Which is another good reason to do it.
-
Tucker's not going to like this at all.
Which is another good reason to do it.
He’ll be outraged as I’m not at all certain that Tucker is aware that the UK is a sovereign country.
-
He’ll be outraged as I’m not at all certain that Tucker is aware that the UK is a sovereign country.
@Renauda said in Challenger:
He’ll be outraged as I’m not at all certain that Tucker is aware that the UK is a sovereign country.
Not since the Islamic takeover that Fox was so worried about.
-
I wonder.
One of the "problems" with French, American, German and God knows what else equipment, is parts and service, especially if the equipment is a dozen here or there. None of this stuff is new and it's going to break. And different types of armor take different types of training. At least most of the NATO stuff can use the same ammo, in a pinch.
I don't know if this small amount of tanks may not cause more problems than they solve.
-
I wonder.
One of the "problems" with French, American, German and God knows what else equipment, is parts and service, especially if the equipment is a dozen here or there. None of this stuff is new and it's going to break. And different types of armor take different types of training. At least most of the NATO stuff can use the same ammo, in a pinch.
I don't know if this small amount of tanks may not cause more problems than they solve.
That’s a valid point. At least they can service older Soviet vintage equipment laying around in former WP arsenals.
More importantly it ties into the question as to what are NATO’s, and more specifically Washington’s, objectives in this war as this article from the Guardian points out:
