Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. American Thinker - Lingerie Edition

American Thinker - Lingerie Edition

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
8 Posts 6 Posters 90 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    If it ain't broke, don't go woke...

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/01/as_victorias_secret_goes.html

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      How does a company based on objectifying women get woke?

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
      • Doctor PhibesD Online
        Doctor PhibesD Online
        Doctor Phibes
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I suspect high street shops going under has a lot more to do with Amazon than it does with wokedom.

        I was only joking

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Mik

          How does a company based on objectifying women get woke?

          LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins Dad
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @Mik said in American Thinker - Lingerie Edition:

          How does a company based on objectifying women get woke?

          You've not seen their plus size models?

          The Brad

          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • CopperC Offline
            CopperC Offline
            Copper
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Skinny clothes for fat people doesn't seem right to me.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

              @Mik said in American Thinker - Lingerie Edition:

              How does a company based on objectifying women get woke?

              You've not seen their plus size models?

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @LuFins-Dad said in American Thinker - Lingerie Edition:

              @Mik said in American Thinker - Lingerie Edition:

              How does a company based on objectifying women get woke?

              You've not seen their plus size models?

              alt text

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Scientific American is propagating irrational religious nonsense, and Vickie's Secret is propagating ugly women. I suppose the stupid and ugly among us are feeling better about themselves. That seems virtuous. It's just a matter of time before the party of the woke runs a candidate with Down Syndrome.

                Education is extremely important.

                LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                • HoraceH Horace

                  Scientific American is propagating irrational religious nonsense, and Vickie's Secret is propagating ugly women. I suppose the stupid and ugly among us are feeling better about themselves. That seems virtuous. It's just a matter of time before the party of the woke runs a candidate with Down Syndrome.

                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins Dad
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @Horace said in American Thinker - Lingerie Edition:

                  Scientific American is propagating irrational religious nonsense, and Vickie's Secret is propagating ugly women. I suppose the stupid and ugly among us are feeling better about themselves. That seems virtuous. It's just a matter of time before the party of the woke runs a candidate with Down Syndrome.

                  alt text

                  The Brad

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups