Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge

Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
16 Posts 8 Posters 152 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Away
    M Away
    Mik
    wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 17:38 last edited by Mik 12 Feb 2022, 17:44
    #7

    What was the proximate cause of the death? Once one has set these events in motion, can they claim to be exempt for the consequences? I don't think so. While he was fleeing the robbery he was still in the commission of a felony, hence felony murder. A claim of self-defense in those circumstances is pretty weak.

    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

    H 1 Reply Last reply 2 Dec 2022, 17:41
    • M Mik
      2 Dec 2022, 17:38

      What was the proximate cause of the death? Once one has set these events in motion, can they claim to be exempt for the consequences? I don't think so. While he was fleeing the robbery he was still in the commission of a felony, hence felony murder. A claim of self-defense in those circumstances is pretty weak.

      H Offline
      H Offline
      Horace
      wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 17:41 last edited by
      #8

      @Mik said in Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge:

      What was the proximate cause of the death? Once one has set these events in motion, can they claim to be exempt for the consequences? I don't think so. While he was feeling the robbery he was still in the commission of a felony, hence felony murder. A claim of self-defense in those circumstances is pretty weak.

      That would seem to be an accurate description of the real complexity of this case.

      Which is not to say Jon or 89th are wrong, just that this is what we pay lawyers for and what we conscript juries for. Except when Soros DAs refuse to press charges, I guess.

      Education is extremely important.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • M Away
        M Away
        Mik
        wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 17:45 last edited by Mik 12 Feb 2022, 17:48
        #9

        The alternative is to further victimize businesses and their employees.

        At some point we should decide which team we are on - rights for law abiding citizens or criminals. My own feeling is that once you have crossed that line into threatening another in a robbery, well fuck you. You get what you get. Turning the store owner into the criminal is just wrong.

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        1 Reply Last reply
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 19:42 last edited by
          #10

          Once you steal, all bets are off.

          Murder 2 and hang the SOB.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • G Offline
            G Offline
            George K
            wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 19:55 last edited by
            #11

            If the theft rises to the level of a felony, perhaps he could be charged with felony murder?

            I dunno.

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            H C 2 Replies Last reply 2 Dec 2022, 20:16
            • G George K
              2 Dec 2022, 19:55

              If the theft rises to the level of a felony, perhaps he could be charged with felony murder?

              I dunno.

              H Offline
              H Offline
              Horace
              wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 20:16 last edited by
              #12

              @George-K said in Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge:

              If the theft rises to the level of a felony, perhaps he could be charged with felony murder?

              I dunno.

              Yeah the funny thing is that we have laws, not sure about CA but in some states, where if you use a gun in the commission of a felony and someone dies, you get a murder charge regardless of the circumstances of the death. Those sorts of laws are meant as bandaids around the legalities of situations like this, to conform more to common sense.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • G George K
                2 Dec 2022, 19:55

                If the theft rises to the level of a felony, perhaps he could be charged with felony murder?

                I dunno.

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Catseye3
                wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 20:22 last edited by Catseye3 12 Mar 2022, 14:32
                #13

                @George-K said in Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge:

                If the theft rises to the level of a felony, perhaps he could be charged with felony murder?

                This might be a stretch, but if there were no witnesses to the robbery, then he could not be charged with robbery. The law would only see him being chased by a guy shooting at him.

                Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                1 Reply Last reply
                • J jon-nyc
                  2 Dec 2022, 17:21

                  It has a certain logic to it. If the clerk came out shooting after the robbery had ended and the guy left then he was committing attempted murder. I don’t see how the robber loses his right to self defense because he robbed a store a few minutes earlier.

                  Of course if it all went down together it would be far more complicated.

                  A Away
                  A Away
                  Axtremus
                  wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 22:11 last edited by
                  #14

                  @jon-nyc said in Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge:

                  It has a certain logic to it. If the clerk came out shooting after the robbery had ended and the guy left then he was committing attempted murder. I don’t see how the robber loses his right to self defense because he robbed a store a few minutes earlier.

                  Of course if it all went down together it would be far more complicated.

                  What would the logic be if we replace "clerk" with "police"?

                  G 1 Reply Last reply 2 Dec 2022, 22:24
                  • A Axtremus
                    2 Dec 2022, 22:11

                    @jon-nyc said in Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge:

                    It has a certain logic to it. If the clerk came out shooting after the robbery had ended and the guy left then he was committing attempted murder. I don’t see how the robber loses his right to self defense because he robbed a store a few minutes earlier.

                    Of course if it all went down together it would be far more complicated.

                    What would the logic be if we replace "clerk" with "police"?

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 22:24 last edited by
                    #15

                    @Axtremus said in Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge:

                    What would the logic be if we replace "clerk" with "police"?

                    Presumably, the fleeing robber was not a threat to anyone's life. Unless I missed it, he was, after all, fleeing, and not shooting at anyone. No threat to life means use of deadly force is not justified.

                    Hell, in Chicago, the police would even be allowed to chase him.

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    J 1 Reply Last reply 2 Dec 2022, 23:01
                    • G George K
                      2 Dec 2022, 22:24

                      @Axtremus said in Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge:

                      What would the logic be if we replace "clerk" with "police"?

                      Presumably, the fleeing robber was not a threat to anyone's life. Unless I missed it, he was, after all, fleeing, and not shooting at anyone. No threat to life means use of deadly force is not justified.

                      Hell, in Chicago, the police would even be allowed to chase him.

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 23:01 last edited by
                      #16

                      @George-K said in Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge:

                      @Axtremus said in Fleeing Armed Robber Kills His Pursuing Victim, No Murder Charge:

                      What would the logic be if we replace "clerk" with "police"?

                      Presumably, the fleeing robber was not a threat to anyone's life. Unless I missed it, he was, after all, fleeing, and not shooting at anyone. No threat to life means use of deadly force is not justified.

                      Hell, in Chicago, the police would even be allowed to chase him.

                      By the law, not justified. Does not meet the "imminent danger" threshold.

                      OTOH, shooting thieves is fine by me. And for killing a guy who was chasing the thief, I'd still like to hang the thief.

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes

                      16/16

                      2 Dec 2022, 23:01


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      16 out of 16
                      • First post
                        16/16
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups