The person in charge of nuclear waste in America
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 15:57 last edited by
Again, it should be known by now whether or not he had a suitcase that could be mistaken for the one he took, and what happened to it when not claimed.
Long on innuendo, short on facts. Junk journalism.
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 18:11 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
Insert appropriate text into speech bubble....
-
Again, it should be known by now whether or not he had a suitcase that could be mistaken for the one he took, and what happened to it when not claimed.
Long on innuendo, short on facts. Junk journalism.
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 18:32 last edited by@Mik said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
Again, it should be known by now whether or not he had a suitcase that could be mistaken for the one he took, and what happened to it when not claimed.
Long on innuendo, short on facts. Junk journalism.
Well, first and foremost they have him removing the name tag on video. Second, he didn’t call the airline when he opened the suitcase and discovered the wrong clothes. Third, he initially lied to the police? Those are three pretty damning facts and not innuendo.
Beyond that? Why on earth would anyone travel with $2350 suitcase? Have you seen how they are treated by the airport porters? No way. I’ll invest a little bit for something durable, but $2000 for a fashion piece? Sheesh…
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 18:53 last edited by
I purposely buy cheap samsonites for that reason.
-
@Mik said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
Again, it should be known by now whether or not he had a suitcase that could be mistaken for the one he took, and what happened to it when not claimed.
Long on innuendo, short on facts. Junk journalism.
Well, first and foremost they have him removing the name tag on video. Second, he didn’t call the airline when he opened the suitcase and discovered the wrong clothes. Third, he initially lied to the police? Those are three pretty damning facts and not innuendo.
Beyond that? Why on earth would anyone travel with $2350 suitcase? Have you seen how they are treated by the airport porters? No way. I’ll invest a little bit for something durable, but $2000 for a fashion piece? Sheesh…
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 19:32 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
@Mik said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
Again, it should be known by now whether or not he had a suitcase that could be mistaken for the one he took, and what happened to it when not claimed.
Long on innuendo, short on facts. Junk journalism.
Well, first and foremost they have him removing the name tag on video. Second, he didn’t call the airline when he opened the suitcase and discovered the wrong clothes. Third, he initially lied to the police? Those are three pretty damning facts and not innuendo.
Beyond that? Why on earth would anyone travel with $2350 suitcase? Have you seen how they are treated by the airport porters? No way. I’ll invest a little bit for something durable, but $2000 for a fashion piece? Sheesh…
I agree those facts are damning, but still incomplete. Junk journalism.
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 20:17 last edited by
Their jewelry is beyond tacky.
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 22:15 last edited by
https://alphanews.org/biden-admins-sam-brinton-was-in-town-for-conference-when-he-stole-luggage/
When Brinton arrived in St. Paul for the conference, he allegedly went to baggage claim and stole a woman’s blue Vera Bradley roller bag, ripped the luggage tag from the bag, and then left the area at a “quick pace.”
He didn’t check a bag and therefore had no reason to stop at baggage claim in the first place, according to the complaint.
Brinton used the stolen bag on his return trip to D.C. and during an October excursion to Europe, the complaint says.
He wasn’t charged until Oct. 27. The bag and its contents were worth an estimated $2,300.
Brinton initially denied taking someone else’s luggage but later told police that he was tired and thought the bag was his, the charges say.
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 22:31 last edited by
He thought it was the bag he didn’t check. Right.
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 22:32 last edited by Horace 12 Sept 2022, 05:05
It’s getting to the point where we can’t even trust mentally ill people.
-
wrote on 9 Dec 2022, 04:58 last edited by
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
wrote on 9 Dec 2022, 11:55 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
Again?
Well, how else can you complete your luggage set? That stuff costs money!
-
wrote on 9 Dec 2022, 12:20 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
Again?
If for no other reason,
heshetheyximthis person should be dismissed because of poor decision making."Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
wrote on 9 Dec 2022, 13:00 last edited by
By the way, if I'm ever in need of learning how to do rope bondage, I know where to look.
***NSFW content***
click to show -
@jon-nyc said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
Again?
If for no other reason,
heshetheyximthis person should be dismissed because of poor decision making.wrote on 9 Dec 2022, 13:11 last edited by@George-K said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
... this person should be dismissed because of poor decision making.
Agree. This person has already been suspended from official duty before the second incident. Most likely it's just a matter of time for formal dismissal.
-
@jon-nyc said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
Again?
If for no other reason,
heshetheyximthis person should be dismissed because of poor decision making.wrote on 10 Dec 2022, 12:32 last edited by@George-K said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
@jon-nyc said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
Again?
If for no other reason,
heshetheyximthis person should be dismissed because of poor decision making.In a sane world, yes. But in a sane world you don’t exchange the Merchant of Death for a stoner, lesbian, basketball player.
-
wrote on 10 Dec 2022, 13:30 last edited by
-
wrote on 10 Dec 2022, 14:11 last edited by
Remember when this person was held up as a model to the general public for the Trans community?
The Brad
-
wrote on 10 Dec 2022, 14:17 last edited by
Sorry, but fucked in the head is fucked in the head.
-
Remember when this person was held up as a model to the general public for the Trans community?
wrote on 10 Dec 2022, 14:39 last edited byNo, but I’m not the least bit surprised
-
Remember when this person was held up as a model to the general public for the Trans community?
wrote on 10 Dec 2022, 17:07 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in The person in charge of nuclear waste in America:
Remember when this person was held up as a model to the general public for the Trans community?
That is what he is now.
