The ultimate "pride" flag
-
-
Homosexuals and lesbians exhibit abnormal behavior. We used to consider it mental illness. We still should. Religious objections aside, it's a dead end biologically and in some cases can cause physical harm, ranging from anal tearing, forced UTI's, etc.
As a society, we used to understand some common beneficial societal ideas and goals...Marriage, monogamy, childhood innocence, parental duties and responsibilities and an absence of tolerated lewd behavior in public, be it in person or via electronic means.
You know, just because we can do something, doesn't mean we should.
-
Homosexuals and lesbians exhibit abnormal behavior. We used to consider it mental illness. We still should. Religious objections aside, it's a dead end biologically and in some cases can cause physical harm, ranging from anal tearing, forced UTI's, etc.
As a society, we used to understand some common beneficial societal ideas and goals...Marriage, monogamy, childhood innocence, parental duties and responsibilities and an absence of tolerated lewd behavior in public, be it in person or via electronic means.
You know, just because we can do something, doesn't mean we should.
@Jolly said in The ultimate "pride" flag:
Homosexuals and lesbians exhibit abnormal behavior. We used to consider it mental illness. We still should.
Now we know better. Don’t back slide.
Religious objections aside, it's a dead end biologically and in some cases can cause physical harm, ranging from anal tearing, forced UTI's, etc.
The “biological dead end” is no longer an issue with artificial insemination technologies.
As for “anal tearing” and forced UTI, that’s an objection to anal penetration and maybe an objection to “scissoring”, not necessarily an objection to homosexuality. (Don’t forget that heterosexuals can and do engage in “anal sex” too.) The risks for “anal tearing” and forced UTI are no higher for the homosexuals once anal penetration and “scissoring” are taken off the table.
-
It's an established fact that liberals tend to be dumb. If they can be convinced that free market capitalistic companies are aligned with their values, maybe it's for the best. One must placate the lesser beings of our society in some way, or they tend to cause trouble.
-
@Jolly said in The ultimate "pride" flag:
Homosexuals and lesbians exhibit abnormal behavior. We used to consider it mental illness. We still should.
Now we know better. Don’t back slide.
Religious objections aside, it's a dead end biologically and in some cases can cause physical harm, ranging from anal tearing, forced UTI's, etc.
The “biological dead end” is no longer an issue with artificial insemination technologies.
As for “anal tearing” and forced UTI, that’s an objection to anal penetration and maybe an objection to “scissoring”, not necessarily an objection to homosexuality. (Don’t forget that heterosexuals can and do engage in “anal sex” too.) The risks for “anal tearing” and forced UTI are no higher for the homosexuals once anal penetration and “scissoring” are taken off the table.
-
@Jolly said in The ultimate "pride" flag:
Homosexuals and lesbians exhibit abnormal behavior. We used to consider it mental illness. We still should.
Now we know better. Don’t back slide.
Religious objections aside, it's a dead end biologically and in some cases can cause physical harm, ranging from anal tearing, forced UTI's, etc.
The “biological dead end” is no longer an issue with artificial insemination technologies.
As for “anal tearing” and forced UTI, that’s an objection to anal penetration and maybe an objection to “scissoring”, not necessarily an objection to homosexuality. (Don’t forget that heterosexuals can and do engage in “anal sex” too.) The risks for “anal tearing” and forced UTI are no higher for the homosexuals once anal penetration and “scissoring” are taken off the table.
@Axtremus said in The ultimate "pride" flag:
@Jolly said in The ultimate "pride" flag:
Homosexuals and lesbians exhibit abnormal behavior. We used to consider it mental illness. We still should.
Now we know better. Don’t back slide.
Religious objections aside, it's a dead end biologically and in some cases can cause physical harm, ranging from anal tearing, forced UTI's, etc.
The “biological dead end” is no longer an issue with artificial insemination technologies.
As for “anal tearing” and forced UTI, that’s an objection to anal penetration and maybe an objection to “scissoring”, not necessarily an objection to homosexuality. (Don’t forget that heterosexuals can and do engage in “anal sex” too.) The risks for “anal tearing” and forced UTI are no higher for the homosexuals once anal penetration and “scissoring” are taken off the table.
Dude, they're fucked up in the head, to put it bluntly. Just because you want to label them normal, does not make it so.
Leftists have learned you have to do two things to destroy society:
- First, own the language. Words mean whatever the Red Queen says they mean.
- Define deviance downward. Lesbianism? Check. Homosexuality? Check. Polygamy? Check. Polyandry? Check. Pedophilia? Check. Incest? Check. Homosexual Incest? Check.
Shucks, if two guys could adopt at regular intervals, maybe they could have a chain of virgin assholes at predetermined waypoints. If two people love each other, what's the problem with it?
Now, if the Left can succeed in getting society to wallow in its own filth and to elevate the deviants to oracle status, they are assured the rapid destruction of that society. It's classic, but so very effective.
