-
-
He had to sell it to help dig his in-laws out of a financial hole and because of some building restrictions he found out about after purchase, but BIL had 3.2 acres in a nice gaited community close to Sawgrass that he wanted to build on. George would have really liked it, as several of the people in the community had horses and there was a bridal trail that meandered through the place.
Problem with building, was that he couldn't develop his entire lot. EPA had classified part of the community as wetland and even though it didn't look like any wetland I had ever seen, a natural drainage on the property couldn't be touched. Not a culvert, not a French drain, not a nuthin'. It took that lot down to about an acre and a half that could actually be used.
-
Well, as a friend of mine who live out West says, You can't build a bunch of cities on land where it takes 100 acres to raise a cow and a calf.
-
A different “navigable water” case simmering in Colorado that, if it reaches the Supreme Court, will also be a BFD:
A different “navigable water” case simmering in Colorado that, if it reaches the Supreme Court, will also be a BFD:
What is your opinion on this case?
