Equity explained

[Mik]

[Horace]

It would be interesting to do a roll call of everybody who makes noises about being charitable, asking them to define exactly the tangible effect on their lives their personal sacrifices entail. Defining what one gives is less interesting than defining the real sacrifices one makes. But the answer to that latter question in most cases is zero, and in fact theoretically negative, in that the noises about making sacrifices, are beneficial to one’s social status. As they have been in spades, to social climbing champion of the world Michelle Obama and the electable horse she rode in on.

[Jolly]

You know, I think Trump is the only U.S. President in 50 years (or more) who was worth less when he left office, than when elected.

[George K]

@Jolly said in Equity explained:

You know, I think Trump is the only U.S. President in 50 years (or more) who was worth less when he left office, than when elected.

DIdn't take a salary either - well, he took it and donated it.

[jon-nyc]

@Jolly said in Equity explained:

You know, I think Trump is the only U.S. President in 50 years (or more) who was worth less when he left office, than when elected.

You think he tarnished his brand that much, on net I mean? It’s not like he gave up any interest in his properties.

[Jolly]

@jon-nyc said in Equity explained:

@Jolly said in Equity explained:

You know, I think Trump is the only U.S. President in 50 years (or more) who was worth less when he left office, than when elected.

You think he tarnished his brand that much, on net I mean? It’s not like he gave up any interest in his properties.

Or maybe he wasn't as good at influence peddling as the current guy. Or stole as much as the guy before him.

[Doctor Phibes]

Or maybe he wasn't as good at influence peddling as the current guy.

I wouldn't let him hear you say that - you'll be the subject of a long Truth Social diatribe. Literally tens of people will be baying for your blood.