She’s gone.
-
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
But if you wanted to boil down their success to a single overriding factor, it would be that they are smart within the profitable domains they choose to compete in.
You could say the same about the British monarchy.
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
But if you wanted to boil down their success to a single overriding factor, it would be that they are smart within the profitable domains they choose to compete in.
You could say the same about the British monarchy.
I guess if you were unconcerned about making sense, you could say that.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
But if you wanted to boil down their success to a single overriding factor, it would be that they are smart within the profitable domains they choose to compete in.
You could say the same about the British monarchy.
I guess if you were unconcerned about making sense, you could say that.
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
But if you wanted to boil down their success to a single overriding factor, it would be that they are smart within the profitable domains they choose to compete in.
You could say the same about the British monarchy.
I guess if you were unconcerned about making sense, you could say that.
The Queen's success was based on her overwhelming popularity. That didn't just happen.
And they're not rich because of the money they get as the monarchy.
-
As an aside, what Elizabeth II’s passing sets into motion in Canada:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-plan-queen-elizabeth-death-1.6575741
At the local level in Alberta:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/queen-elizabeth-alberta-legislature-1.6576911
I suspect similar protocols and procedures are also initiated in Australia and New Zealand.
Elbows up!
-
As an aside, what Elizabeth II’s passing sets into motion in Canada:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-plan-queen-elizabeth-death-1.6575741
At the local level in Alberta:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/queen-elizabeth-alberta-legislature-1.6576911
I suspect similar protocols and procedures are also initiated in Australia and New Zealand.
@Renauda said in She’s gone.:
As an aside, what Elizabeth II’s passing sets into motion in Canada:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-plan-queen-elizabeth-death-1.6575741Thanks, Renauda. Has the government announced yet what the mourning period will be?
A click from that article takes you to "Charles as King: What kind of monarch will he be?" An excerpt:
"It was a question that haunted the new King for decades: Just what kind of monarch would Charles be?
"It's a tricky question, getting to the fundamental role of the one who wears the crown. To what extent could — or should — that individual share opinions? What about involvement in affairs of state? Or politics?
"That has been a perpetual worry with Charles, whose activism as Prince of Wales in areas as diverse as architecture, organic farming and global warming has been seen by some as ahead of its time, but also left many wondering how he would reign.
"As he turned 70 in 2018, Charles addressed the issue head on, telling the BBC he understood he would have to act differently once he became King.
"I'm not that stupid," he said when asked if his public campaigning would continue after he succeeds his mother. "I do realize that it is a separate exercise being sovereign, so of course I understand entirely how that should operate."
Well, that's good, Your Majesty. It's good to realize things.
I'd say more, but I realize
evenCharles knows more about being a monarch than I do.Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka
-
An interesting point about the monarch - in theory they have no power, and they're not allowed to vote. However, for the last 70 years the Queen has met privately with the Prime Minister every week, going back to Churchill. That's a whole lot of experience and influence....
I was only joking
-
@Renauda said in She’s gone.:
As an aside, what Elizabeth II’s passing sets into motion in Canada:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-plan-queen-elizabeth-death-1.6575741Thanks, Renauda. Has the government announced yet what the mourning period will be?
A click from that article takes you to "Charles as King: What kind of monarch will he be?" An excerpt:
"It was a question that haunted the new King for decades: Just what kind of monarch would Charles be?
"It's a tricky question, getting to the fundamental role of the one who wears the crown. To what extent could — or should — that individual share opinions? What about involvement in affairs of state? Or politics?
"That has been a perpetual worry with Charles, whose activism as Prince of Wales in areas as diverse as architecture, organic farming and global warming has been seen by some as ahead of its time, but also left many wondering how he would reign.
"As he turned 70 in 2018, Charles addressed the issue head on, telling the BBC he understood he would have to act differently once he became King.
"I'm not that stupid," he said when asked if his public campaigning would continue after he succeeds his mother. "I do realize that it is a separate exercise being sovereign, so of course I understand entirely how that should operate."
Well, that's good, Your Majesty. It's good to realize things.
I'd say more, but I realize
evenCharles knows more about being a monarch than I do. -
An interesting point about the monarch - in theory they have no power, and they're not allowed to vote. However, for the last 70 years the Queen has met privately with the Prime Minister every week, going back to Churchill. That's a whole lot of experience and influence....
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
That's a whole lot of experience and influence....
That's why I wonder if she didn't have a hand in things, even if in the form of a palace person at a social affair dropping a casual, "You know, Her Majesty agrees with your position, Minister. Just saying."
Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
That's a whole lot of experience and influence....
That's why I wonder if she didn't have a hand in things, even if in the form of a palace person at a social affair dropping a casual, "You know, Her Majesty agrees with your position, Minister. Just saying."
@Catseye3 said in She’s gone.:
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
That's a whole lot of experience and influence....
That's why I wonder if she didn't have a hand in things, even if in the form of a palace person at a social affair dropping a casual, "You know, Her Majesty agrees with your position, Minister. Just saying."
I think her value might be more in saying 'have you considered....' based on her experience.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
That's a whole lot of experience and influence....
That's why I wonder if she didn't have a hand in things, even if in the form of a palace person at a social affair dropping a casual, "You know, Her Majesty agrees with your position, Minister. Just saying."
The Queen normally had a weekly in camera meeting with the Prime Minister. There was no one else in attendance. What was discussed was exclusively between the two of them. No PM has ever divulged publicly what was discussed in these meetings other than in the most general terms.
-
What a perfect opportunity to ascribe whatever importance to those meetings that one wants to.
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
What a perfect opportunity to ascribe whatever importance to those meetings that one wants to.
If there was no importance, they wouldn't have them.
I was only joking
-
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
What a perfect opportunity to ascribe whatever importance to those meetings that one wants to.
If there was no importance, they wouldn't have them.
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
What a perfect opportunity to ascribe whatever importance to those meetings that one wants to.
If there was no importance, they wouldn't have them.
They could easily be vestigial. Why make a public display of ending the tradition? To whose benefit would that be?
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
What a perfect opportunity to ascribe whatever importance to those meetings that one wants to.
If there was no importance, they wouldn't have them.
They could easily be vestigial. Why make a public display of ending the tradition? To whose benefit would that be?
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
What a perfect opportunity to ascribe whatever importance to those meetings that one wants to.
If there was no importance, they wouldn't have them.
They could easily be vestigial. Why make a public display of ending the tradition? To whose benefit would that be?
I'd guess the value and influence varied, depending on the particular Prime Minister, but you'd have to be a right clot not to at least listen to somebody with that level of experience.
-
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
What a perfect opportunity to ascribe whatever importance to those meetings that one wants to.
If there was no importance, they wouldn't have them.
They could easily be vestigial. Why make a public display of ending the tradition? To whose benefit would that be?
I'd guess the value and influence varied, depending on the particular Prime Minister, but you'd have to be a right clot not to at least listen to somebody with that level of experience.
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
What a perfect opportunity to ascribe whatever importance to those meetings that one wants to.
If there was no importance, they wouldn't have them.
They could easily be vestigial. Why make a public display of ending the tradition? To whose benefit would that be?
I'd guess the value and influence varied, depending on the particular Prime Minister, but you'd have to be a right clot not to at least listen to somebody with that level of experience.
In other contexts, for instance with senators or judges, most people seem to think the cons of long experience begin to outweigh the pros.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
What a perfect opportunity to ascribe whatever importance to those meetings that one wants to.
If there was no importance, they wouldn't have them.
They could easily be vestigial. Why make a public display of ending the tradition? To whose benefit would that be?
I'd guess the value and influence varied, depending on the particular Prime Minister, but you'd have to be a right clot not to at least listen to somebody with that level of experience.
In other contexts, for instance with senators or judges, most people seem to think the cons of long experience begin to outweigh the pros.
@Horace said in She’s gone.:
In other contexts, for instance with senators or judges, most people seem to think the cons of long experience begin to outweigh the pros.
Yeah, but your country is only like 40 years old. We understand the value of decrepitude.
If you don't believe me, look at Joe Biden and Donald Trump!
-
So England is kind of like a rudderless ship right now… Would make a great opportunity for a former colony to invade and put a true democracy in place…
The Brad
-
So England is kind of like a rudderless ship right now… Would make a great opportunity for a former colony to invade and put a true democracy in place…
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
