More Twitter Censorship
-
(basically copied from the RWEC)
See if you can find the Twitter violation in the following statement:
Funny, don’t remember the FBI raiding Chappaqua or Whitehaven to find the 33,000 potential classified documents Hillary Clinton deleted. And she was just a former secretary of state, not a former president.
Or this?
The current deputy general counsel at Twitter is also the former general counsel at FBI HQ under Comey. His name as you may know is James Baker, and he was the top attorney who reviewed the fraudulent anti-Trump FISA wiretap warrants for probable cause.
Well, we can't have that, can we?
Turley comments:
Twitter can adopt a general free speech platform model while allowing individuals to apply specific filters to block racist terms or profane language. Free speech includes the right to readers to choose what they read. The key is that the decision can be left to readers rather than imposed by the company. Just as you can walk away from speakers in the town square, you can choose what you read. You can also choose to read more broadly. Twitter can leave such decisions in the hands of the consumer.
As we approach the critical midterm election, Twitter’s censorship cadre appears to be ramping up controls on what views can be expressed or read. Agrawal’s pledge to limit discussion to “healthy” viewpoints continues to manifest itself in Twitter’s burgeoning censorship system.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
I don’t understand the comparison. HRC cooperated and turned over the servers.
If the FBI had specific information that she had retained some and lied about it and still chose not to execute a search then he would have a point.
"You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
-Cormac McCarthy -
(basically copied from the RWEC)
See if you can find the Twitter violation in the following statement:
Funny, don’t remember the FBI raiding Chappaqua or Whitehaven to find the 33,000 potential classified documents Hillary Clinton deleted. And she was just a former secretary of state, not a former president.
Or this?
The current deputy general counsel at Twitter is also the former general counsel at FBI HQ under Comey. His name as you may know is James Baker, and he was the top attorney who reviewed the fraudulent anti-Trump FISA wiretap warrants for probable cause.
Well, we can't have that, can we?
Turley comments:
Twitter can adopt a general free speech platform model while allowing individuals to apply specific filters to block racist terms or profane language. Free speech includes the right to readers to choose what they read. The key is that the decision can be left to readers rather than imposed by the company. Just as you can walk away from speakers in the town square, you can choose what you read. You can also choose to read more broadly. Twitter can leave such decisions in the hands of the consumer.
As we approach the critical midterm election, Twitter’s censorship cadre appears to be ramping up controls on what views can be expressed or read. Agrawal’s pledge to limit discussion to “healthy” viewpoints continues to manifest itself in Twitter’s burgeoning censorship system.
@George-K said in More Twitter Censorship:
(basically copied from the RWEC)
See if you can find the Twitter violation in the following statement:
You mean you can't? It's a statement the Twitter team finds threatening, because they're crazy and trapped in a social bubble of their own making. So, gotta suspend 'em.
-
@George-K said in More Twitter Censorship:
(basically copied from the RWEC)
See if you can find the Twitter violation in the following statement:
You mean you can't? It's a statement the Twitter team finds threatening, because they're crazy and trapped in a social bubble of their own making. So, gotta suspend 'em.
@Aqua-Letifer said in More Twitter Censorship:
It's a statement the Twitter team finds threatening, because they're crazy and trapped in a social bubble of their own making.
Does that not make it a thing you'd want to avoid?
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in More Twitter Censorship:
It's a statement the Twitter team finds threatening, because they're crazy and trapped in a social bubble of their own making.
Does that not make it a thing you'd want to avoid?
@Catseye3 said in More Twitter Censorship:
@Aqua-Letifer said in More Twitter Censorship:
It's a statement the Twitter team finds threatening, because they're crazy and trapped in a social bubble of their own making.
Does that not make it a thing you'd want to avoid?
Well yeah, but it's not just Twitter. A whole lot of online communities and platforms have this problem. So you do what you can to filter out the crazy while trying to use the tools in a constructive way.
-
I don’t understand the comparison. HRC cooperated and turned over the servers.
If the FBI had specific information that she had retained some and lied about it and still chose not to execute a search then he would have a point.
@jon-nyc said in More Twitter Censorship:
HRC cooperated and turned over the servers
After she deleted all those wedding plan and cookbook emails, right?
By the way, did her attorney turn over the thumb-drive copy of her emails? I honestly don't know.
