Housing vs. The IRS
-
Mentioned teacher housing in another thread, which caused another thought...You don't see many church parsonages nowadays. They used to be very common. It was a way for smaller churches with less means, to recruit and keep a pastor, even though they couldn't pay higher salaries.
That died when the IRS decided to tax housing. It would also be an impediment to a teacher housing program, at K-12 or even university levels.
Is it time to change the tax code back to the way it used to be? At least for some classes of employees?
-
Mentioned teacher housing in another thread, which caused another thought...You don't see many church parsonages nowadays. They used to be very common. It was a way for smaller churches with less means, to recruit and keep a pastor, even though they couldn't pay higher salaries.
That died when the IRS decided to tax housing. It would also be an impediment to a teacher housing program, at K-12 or even university levels.
Is it time to change the tax code back to the way it used to be? At least for some classes of employees?
@Jolly said in Housing vs. The IRS:
Is it time to change the tax code back to the way it used to be? At least for some classes of employees?
I don't like the idea of the government creating yet more "special classes" of employees; if anything, I'd rather eliminate/reduce "special classes" than to add more of them.
It also does not appear consistent with your own view that "education" is a state matter, not a federal matter. (But if you don't think that's the case, please feel free to tell me why.)
-
@Jolly said in Housing vs. The IRS:
Education is a state matter, but the taxation occurs on a Federal level.
But inviting the IRS (a federal agency) to specifically target “education” (a state matter) personnel, you are inviting the federal government to extent its tentacles into a state matter, no?
-
@Jolly said in Housing vs. The IRS:
Education is a state matter, but the taxation occurs on a Federal level.
But inviting the IRS (a federal agency) to specifically target “education” (a state matter) personnel, you are inviting the federal government to extent its tentacles into a state matter, no?
@Axtremus said in Housing vs. The IRS:
@Jolly said in Housing vs. The IRS:
Education is a state matter, but the taxation occurs on a Federal level.
But inviting the IRS (a federal agency) to specifically target “education” (a state matter) personnel, you are inviting the federal government to extent its tentacles into a state matter, no?
I don't think so, unless we revert back to the CSA Constitution or declare federal income tax unconstitutional.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login