Sandmann Loses
-
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 19:15 last edited by
People. All lawyers ask for Summary Judgement at the beginning of a civil case. Except in the absolute most cut-and-dried cases, SJ is denied by the judge. This only mean the case proceeds as any civil case might. Picking juries, etc.
-
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 19:16 last edited by
I don’t know. It’s common in personal injury but I don’t know where else.
Now I’m waiting for the Advisory Opinions podcast about it. And maybe Ken White’s new podcast.
-
People. All lawyers ask for Summary Judgement at the beginning of a civil case. Except in the absolute most cut-and-dried cases, SJ is denied by the judge. This only mean the case proceeds as any civil case might. Picking juries, etc.
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 19:17 last edited by@Jolly said in Sandmann Loses:
People. All lawyers ask for Summary Judgement at the beginning of a civil case. Except in the absolute most cut-and-dried cases, SJ is denied by the judge. This only mean the case proceeds as any civil case might. Picking juries, etc.
The way I read it, the judge provided a summary judgment against Sandmann.
-
@Jolly said in Sandmann Loses:
People. All lawyers ask for Summary Judgement at the beginning of a civil case. Except in the absolute most cut-and-dried cases, SJ is denied by the judge. This only mean the case proceeds as any civil case might. Picking juries, etc.
The way I read it, the judge provided a summary judgment against Sandmann.
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 19:17 last edited by@Horace said in Sandmann Loses:
@Jolly said in Sandmann Loses:
People. All lawyers ask for Summary Judgement at the beginning of a civil case. Except in the absolute most cut-and-dried cases, SJ is denied by the judge. This only mean the case proceeds as any civil case might. Picking juries, etc.
The way I read it, the judge provided a summary judgment against Sandmann.
If so, then the Judge has found he has no standing.
-
@Horace said in Sandmann Loses:
@Jolly said in Sandmann Loses:
People. All lawyers ask for Summary Judgement at the beginning of a civil case. Except in the absolute most cut-and-dried cases, SJ is denied by the judge. This only mean the case proceeds as any civil case might. Picking juries, etc.
The way I read it, the judge provided a summary judgment against Sandmann.
If so, then the Judge has found he has no standing.
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 19:58 last edited by Aqua Letifer@Jolly said in Sandmann Loses:
@Horace said in Sandmann Loses:
@Jolly said in Sandmann Loses:
People. All lawyers ask for Summary Judgement at the beginning of a civil case. Except in the absolute most cut-and-dried cases, SJ is denied by the judge. This only mean the case proceeds as any civil case might. Picking juries, etc.
The way I read it, the judge provided a summary judgment against Sandmann.
If so, then the Judge has found he has no standing.
This is bad.
I don't see this as about Sandmann at all. If I break into your house and steal your vinyl, then you call the police, and I get prosecuted. If I gin up a mob with lies, get you fired from your job, make you unemployable, and make your home unsafe, that's far worse. Yet nothing happens to me.
Legally, we need to do something about doxxing and cancel culture. Apply what we currently have, write new ones, something. Because right now, destroying lives is completely legal. And the more you've accomplished, the bigger a target you make.
-
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 20:03 last edited by
Not much is as revealing of character than the degree to which one takes pleasure in the destruction of whomever they consider 'others'. People can be relied on to self-select in this manner, as long as their peer group doesn't shame them for it.
-
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 20:16 last edited by
It's helpful when one can prove damages. He's made millions - more than he might have expected to make in a lifetime with normal earnings.
-
It's helpful when one can prove damages. He's made millions - more than he might have expected to make in a lifetime with normal earnings.
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 20:20 last edited by -
-
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 21:41 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Sandmann Loses:
@George-K But less than you've lost in 4 months, right? lol
Harrumph....
No.
-
@jon-nyc said in Sandmann Loses:
@George-K But less than you've lost in 4 months, right? lol
Harrumph....
No.
wrote on 29 Jul 2022, 00:44 last edited by@George-K said in Sandmann Loses:
@jon-nyc said in Sandmann Loses:
@George-K But less than you've lost in 4 months, right? lol
Harrumph....
No.
I feel your pain, Kimosabe.
-
@George-K said in Sandmann Loses:
@jon-nyc said in Sandmann Loses:
@George-K But less than you've lost in 4 months, right? lol
Harrumph....
No.
I feel your pain, Kimosabe.
wrote on 29 Jul 2022, 00:49 last edited by -
wrote on 29 Jul 2022, 01:00 last edited by
You people need to hew closer to the Horace investment strategy.