This picture got me thinking
-
@Jolly said in This picture got me thinking:
Candid vs. Posed.
1956, cameras were few and far in between. Subjects are seasoned public personalities very aware of being the focus of attention wherever they go and always had handlers/bodyguards around them. Never truly "candid".
-
@Jolly said in This picture got me thinking:
Utter bullshit.
Ya think???
"Few and far between"? In 1956? That's when 35mm SLRs came on the scene. I mean holy shit, the post-war years were literally the boom in the consumer camera market that we still have today.
Come on Ax, if you're going to make shit up, at least google something before you try to pretend you know what you're talking about.
-
-
@Jolly said in This picture got me thinking:
Candid vs. Posed.
1956, cameras were few and far in between. Subjects are seasoned public personalities very aware of being the focus of attention wherever they go and always had handlers/bodyguards around them. Never truly "candid".
@Axtremus said in This picture got me thinking:
@Jolly said in This picture got me thinking:
Candid vs. Posed.
1956, cameras were few and far in between. Subjects are seasoned public personalities very aware of being the focus of attention wherever they go and always had handlers/bodyguards around them. Never truly "candid".
You can’t have it both ways. On one hand you say cameras and pictures of celebrities were rare and on the other you say celebrities were always prepared for photos…
