Sixteen
-
It’s a reasonable framework to lower the voting age and raise the gun buying age. The impact of an individual vote is, in almost all circumstances, not as consequential as the firing of a gun in uncontrolled/unsupervised environment. An 18-year old, even when rash, simply cannot do as much damage with a vote than with a gun. From that perspective, it is quite reasonable to set the voting age lower than gun ownership age.
-
It’s a reasonable framework to lower the voting age and raise the gun buying age. The impact of an individual vote is, in almost all circumstances, not as consequential as the firing of a gun in uncontrolled/unsupervised environment. An 18-year old, even when rash, simply cannot do as much damage with a vote than with a gun. From that perspective, it is quite reasonable to set the voting age lower than gun ownership age.
It’s a reasonable framework to lower the voting age and raise the gun buying age. The impact of an individual vote is, in almost all circumstances, not as consequential as the firing of a gun in uncontrolled/unsupervised environment. An 18-year old, even when rash, simply cannot do as much damage with a vote than with a gun. From that perspective, it is quite reasonable to set the voting age lower than gun ownership age.
Oh…
-
It’s a reasonable framework to lower the voting age and raise the gun buying age. The impact of an individual vote is, in almost all circumstances, not as consequential as the firing of a gun in uncontrolled/unsupervised environment. An 18-year old, even when rash, simply cannot do as much damage with a vote than with a gun. From that perspective, it is quite reasonable to set the voting age lower than gun ownership age.
It’s a reasonable framework to lower the voting age and raise the gun buying age. The impact of an individual vote is, in almost all circumstances, not as consequential as the firing of a gun in uncontrolled/unsupervised environment. An 18-year old, even when rash, simply cannot do as much damage with a vote than with a gun. From that perspective, it is quite reasonable to set the voting age lower than gun ownership age.
Dude, you ain't right.
-
It’s a reasonable framework to lower the voting age and raise the gun buying age. The impact of an individual vote is, in almost all circumstances, not as consequential as the firing of a gun in uncontrolled/unsupervised environment. An 18-year old, even when rash, simply cannot do as much damage with a vote than with a gun. From that perspective, it is quite reasonable to set the voting age lower than gun ownership age.
It’s a reasonable framework to lower the voting age and raise the gun buying age. The impact of an individual vote is, in almost all circumstances, not as consequential as the firing of a gun in uncontrolled/unsupervised environment. An 18-year old, even when rash, simply cannot do as much damage with a vote than with a gun. From that perspective, it is quite reasonable to set the voting age lower than gun ownership age.
What is your preferred voting age Ax, and how do you arrive at that number?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login