Forty-four Percent

[Copper]

A recently released poll found that almost half of male Democrats under the age of 50 said it was acceptable to assassinate political opponents.

This probably means it is acceptable to democrat leaders.

And, it is not strictly legal, but it is OK to do because it is virtuous.

And, if cnn doesn't cover it, it didn't happen.

[Axtremus]

On “assassination”:

On “threatening”:

On “violent political revolution”:

The original poll: https://www.splcenter.org/news/2022/06/01/poll-finds-support-great-replacement-hard-right-ideas

[Copper]

splc

hahahahahahahahaha

[Axtremus]

@Copper said in Forty-four Percent:

splc

hahahahahahahahaha

“Conservative Review” cited SPLC, then subsequently cited by @Jolly.

[jon-nyc]

@Axtremus said in Forty-four Percent:

@Copper said in Forty-four Percent:

splc

hahahahahahahahaha

“Conservative Review” cited SPLC, then subsequently cited by @Jolly.

Right, but Copper was fine with it then, since they had filtered out all the bad news about the in-group.

[Copper]

That makes me a hypocrite.

Should I cancel myself or double down?

I’ll check with my publicist.

[Doctor Phibes]

Conservative Review
hahahahahahahahahaha

Sorry, I shouldn't have said that. I've been told that shooting the messenger is really bad when I do it.

[Jolly]

And...At the end of the day, the survey says what it says. If correct, the group probably most likely to pick up a weapon and kill somebody, is the group most likely to believe political assassination is hunky-dory.

Ipso de facto.

[LuFins Dad]

Political Assassination has better poll numbers than Biden. Interesting.

[Copper]

Those statistics seem to imply that a person might have some responsibility for shooting.

My understanding is that the gun is responsible.