Beware these VPNs

[Klaus]

...together with me! He does an excellent job at playing the cuckold with the tiny wiener.

[Mik]

I use PIA, which is aptly named. Really slows things down.

[jon-nyc]

@Klaus said in Beware these VPNs:

...together with me! He does an excellent job at playing the cuckold with the tiny wiener.

It takes a great makeup artist but hey, I'm supposed to be a German so I have no choice.

[taiwan_girl]

I do occasionally. There are times when certain websites (Not the coffee room!) which are blocked that I would like to access.

[George K]

@Mik said in Beware these VPNs:

I use PIA, which is aptly named. Really slows things down.

I do too, but I've not noticed any real-time slowdowns. Running SpeedTest does show a hit, of course, but it's not serious enough to be an issue in routine use.

Unless, of course, you want that German pr0n, in which case speed is of the essence, as Jon will attest.

[George K]

My experience has been that anything over 25 is more than adequate for browsing, streaming etc. Probably anything more that 12.

Here's what I get right now with an ethernet connection to my router for Comcast:

Connecting to Washington DC via PIA, I get this. About half the speed, but more than adequate:

Let's go to Canada, eh?

A while ago, I saw an article, and I think I posted about it, how many people are paying for broadband they really don't need, or even use.

Does it really matter if you spend two minutes or eight minutes to download some JonPr0n? Probably not.

[George K]

I should add that, whenever we go out of town, I use a VPN to connect via the hotel's WiFi.

[Axtremus]

For personal use, I don't really see the need.

I do not see the need to "hide" which Internet sites I connect to. Using a commercial VPN service simply means that the VPN provider has a full record of which Internet sites I connect to.

For encryption, it's pretty much HTTPS (TLS) everywhere these days. I am comfortable enough with that to not bother with getting a VPN service.

The only caution I'd advise is this: be careful with public Wi-Fi hotspots. Most of the time you really do not know who operate these Wi-Fi hotspots and what data security and data privacy policies govern these hotspots, or if such policies exist at all. When you are not at home (where you operate the Wi-Fi network) and not at work (where your employer operates the Wi-Fi network), just use your mobile phone's cellular data to get onto the Internet, tether your laptop through your mobile phone if you need to get online with your laptop.

[George K]

@Axtremus good comments. My only concern is hitting the data cap through my cell provider. Currently I'm at 8 gigs, and I never come even close to that cap. But 10 days' worth of surfing when I'm out of town might bump up against that.

[Axtremus]

Re: cellular data cap ... short of doing an OS upgrade or MS Office upgrade, the only thing that takes a lot of bandwidth is video streaming. The typical music videos or meme videos on websites and social media platforms are usually fine. But streaming a full feature film or TV series episodes will put a big dent in the cellular data cap.

When I (used to) travel (in the pre-pandemic days), I switch to hotel Wi-Fi if I really want to stream a movie or stream TV episodes to avoid hitting my cellular data cap. Software upgrade can always wait until I get home. If I ever need to log into any service that requires better security (e.g., bank and credit card stuff), I do that only over cellular data.

Then there is email. If you use POP or IMAP, you need to know that you have property configured the security settings to encrypt not just your emails but also your login credentials. If you are not sure about that, then use POP or IMAP only over cellular data or with a VPN. If you’re using a web interface to access your email, you are generally OK if the web service uses HTTPS. Email access using mobile app (e.g., Apple Mail app, Gmail app) for well known providers (e.g., iCloud, Gmail, Yahoo! Mail) are also generally OK over hotel Wi-Fi.

[Larry]

@George-K said in Beware these VPNs:

@jon-nyc said in Beware these VPNs:

I’d pay to watch the World Cup, but nobody will let me, so I do this.

that really good German pr0n?

"Ooh ya, pull that plow, baby! Pull it! Pull it!"

[George K]

@Larry said in Beware these VPNs:

@George-K said in Beware these VPNs:

@jon-nyc said in Beware these VPNs:

I’d pay to watch the World Cup, but nobody will let me, so I do this.

that really good German pr0n?

"Ooh ya, pull that plow, baby! Pull it! Pull it!"

You forgot the umlauts, heathen.

[Larry]

[Mik]

@George-K said in Beware these VPNs:

I should add that, whenever we go out of town, I use a VPN to connect via the hotel's WiFi.

That is where I use it religiously. Have it my phone and ipad.

[jon-nyc]

Ax, do you trust the WiFi in, say, Hiltons? From what I can tell they have a contract with att to provide it everywhere.

Or Starbucks?

I regularly trust these and others but I don’t go to my bank or vanguard or whatever. I would only do that over the cell network

[George K]

@jon-nyc I would never do anything even remotely private over a public network. That's what VPS, or cellular data, are for.

[jon-nyc]

Yeah, but typically I’m reading online news or twitter or posting here. I’ve thought about the WiFi issue before and then fugired, do I really care who sees this?

[mark]

I use Nord VPN on my pc, mac and phone.

[Axtremus]

How I see various public or semi-public Wi-Fi hotspots in North America:

• Marriott, Hilton - won't login to financial accounts or do any software update over their Wi-Fi, but otherwise OK with using them for most things. Stayed in enough of them to be able to tell whether a particular property's Wi-Fi/Internet access system has been brought up to the usual Marriott or Hilton standard. Every once in a while I got into a property newly acquired by the chain and the Wi-Fi doesn't look or feel right (e.g., the way the network is named, the way the login process is handled), then I just treat it like I treat Wi-Fi provided by "other hotels".

• Transportation hubs (airports, train stations, etc.) - the challenge is, when you see a Wi-Fi network name like "ATL Free Wi-Fi", how do you know that it's really operated by the "ATL" airport? If there are obvious, publicly posted signage or public announcements that collaborate that "ATL Free Wi-Fi" is indeed sanctioned by the airport, then I treat it like I treat the Marriott or Hilton Wi-Fi. Otherwise I avoid them.

• Regulated utilities (Comcast's XfinityWiFi, the cable consortium's CableWiFi, AT&T Wi-Fi, T-Mobile Wi-Fi, etc.) - If I can access them using the HotSpot 2.0 standard, then I treat them like I treat the Marriott or Hilton Wi-Fi. Otherwise I avoid them (because I cannot verify whether a network that's named "AT&T Wi-Fi" is indeed operated by AT&T).

• Other hotels, restaurants - won't login to any site that requires that I login, won't do any software update over them, but I otherwise don't mind using them, especially with sites that are accessed using HTTPS/TLS. This, too, is predicated on me being able to verify that the Wi-Fi network is sanctioned by the proprietor (e.g., there are posted signage or the front desk tells me that "XYZ Wi-Fi" is indeed an amenity provided by "XYZ hotel" or "XYZ restaurant"). If I cannot verify that, then I avoid the using the network.

[Klaus]

I think some of you guys are a little hysterical.

I'm happy to use any WiFi, regardless of how "trustworthy" it looks or how encrypted it is. I also don't hesitate to do financial stuff etc. via it.

"Security by obscurity" doesn't work. Encrypting things twice or thrice doesn't increase safety. Taking a wired connection over wireless doesn't increase safety. You choose one good tool that you can trust, then you can forget about all the other mediocre tools.

For internet communication, that tool is certificates and strong encryption, as in HTTPS and SSL/TLS. There are no realistic scenarios how even a malicious attacker who completely controls the WiFi can bypass those security mechanisms.