More Mules
-
He's complaining that Fox and Newsmax are covering up stories that are harmful to Democrats.
OK.
I was only joking
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in More Mules:
He's complaining that Fox and Newsmax are covering up stories that are harmful to Democrats.
OK.
I suppose Fox has calculated that its viewership is not on board, by and large, with the election theft narrative. I doubt that viewership is unconvincible. I also doubt there exists a body of evidence, presented simply and clearly, that is convincing. Granted, I haven't watched the movie, but I don't suppose something of this magnitude would be understood by so few, if it were real and persuasive.
Education is extremely important.
-
@Horace said in More Mules:
@Doctor-Phibes said in More Mules:
He's complaining that Fox and Newsmax are covering up stories that are harmful to Democrats.
OK.
I suppose Fox has calculated that its viewership is not on board, by and large, with the election theft narrative. I doubt that viewership is unconvincible. I also doubt there exists a body of evidence, presented simply and clearly, that is convincing. Granted, I haven't watched the movie, but I don't suppose something of this magnitude would be understood by so few, if it were real and persuasive.
They could also be concerned about legal action. A lot of conspiracy peddlers shut up very quickly last time when Dominion started talking about libel.
I was only joking
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in More Mules:
@Horace said in More Mules:
@Doctor-Phibes said in More Mules:
He's complaining that Fox and Newsmax are covering up stories that are harmful to Democrats.
OK.
I suppose Fox has calculated that its viewership is not on board, by and large, with the election theft narrative. I doubt that viewership is unconvincible. I also doubt there exists a body of evidence, presented simply and clearly, that is convincing. Granted, I haven't watched the movie, but I don't suppose something of this magnitude would be understood by so few, if it were real and persuasive.
They could also be concerned about legal action. A lot of conspiracy peddlers shut up very quickly last time when Dominion started talking about libel.
yeah, if the claims are not demonstrable, and they mention specific people or organizations, that would be actionable.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in More Mules:
@Horace said in More Mules:
@Doctor-Phibes said in More Mules:
He's complaining that Fox and Newsmax are covering up stories that are harmful to Democrats.
OK.
I suppose Fox has calculated that its viewership is not on board, by and large, with the election theft narrative. I doubt that viewership is unconvincible. I also doubt there exists a body of evidence, presented simply and clearly, that is convincing. Granted, I haven't watched the movie, but I don't suppose something of this magnitude would be understood by so few, if it were real and persuasive.
They could also be concerned about legal action. A lot of conspiracy peddlers shut up very quickly last time when Dominion started talking about libel.
Could be.
But what Huckaby is saying is reasonable. Don't ignore what evidence D'Sousa has produced. Look at it objectively, check it out and dismiss it if it's wrong. Follow it more closely if it turns out to be right.
The cell phone data is interesting. We've long known of ballot harvesting being a problem. Everybody knows it, but nobody wants to really pursue it.
I don't like mail-in ballots for multiple reasons, but if we must have them, limit them and make darn sure the person voting is able to vote and his vote has been accurately recorded and submitted.
-
@Mik said in More Mules:
Agreed. Avoid all appearance of impropriety.
The main reason for the vast majority of claims 0f fraud associated with this election were not due to inconsistencies and irregularities, but to somebody being incapable of accepting that he lost.
-
Oh, sod off, fuckwit.
Everything is not always about Trump. He may have wailed that the election was rigged and in many ways, he's right.
But besides that, the primary emphasis should be election integrity. I live in a state, much like some others, where that is not a given, even unto the point here, that rival political factions carried submachine guns down public streets.
You really, really don't want to go there. You come from a country where some godawful wars have been
fought over political power, so you ought to know better.This country will not function well unless all parties agree that the vote count is as correct as humanly possible. Anything else is a slippery slope to a republic in serious trouble.
-
I completely agree that elections should be seen to be completely free and fair. I agree with voter ID, and I think the Democrats insistence that minorities can't get their shit together enough to get an ID is patronizing in the extreme.
However, pretending this current obsession with voter fraud has nothing to do with Donald Trump is taking disingenuity to a whole new level.
