Infowars files for bankruptcy protection
-
In three separate lawsuits, families of those killed at Sandy Hook have said his lies enriched his business, including InfoWars, while leading to their harassment by his followers.
-
People occasionally say I don't know shit from shinola, but I can tell you that guy is one worthless sack of shinola.
-
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-61142905
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. This might seem a tad uncharitable, however to be honest I hope they take everything he owns.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-61142905
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. This might seem a tad uncharitable, however to be honest I hope they take everything he owns.
No. Uncharitable is beating him to death on pay-per-view to generate funds to partially offset the misery he caused by terrorizing mothers who lost their babies.
Turning over his earthly possessions is just the closest approximation to justice that can be achieved without resorting to his level of barbarism.
-
I suspect the lawyers are the only ones who made any money out of this one.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@Horace said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
Strong moral stands are fun.
Calling Alex Jones a scumbag isn't exactly a strong moral stand, more like pointing out the bleeding obvious.
I was only joking
-
@Horace said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
Strong moral stands are fun.
Calling Alex Jones a scumbag isn't exactly a strong moral stand, more like pointing out the bleeding obvious.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
@Horace said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
Strong moral stands are fun.
Calling Alex Jones a scumbag isn't exactly a strong moral stand, more like pointing out the bleeding obvious.
There’s calling him a scumbag, then there’s grandstanding about one’s visceral outrage.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
@Horace said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
Strong moral stands are fun.
Calling Alex Jones a scumbag isn't exactly a strong moral stand, more like pointing out the bleeding obvious.
There’s calling him a scumbag, then there’s grandstanding about one’s visceral outrage.
@Horace said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
There’s calling him a scumbag, then there’s grandstanding about one’s visceral outrage.
Grandstanding about visceral outrage is pretty much exactly what Alex Jones did.
-
@Horace said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
There’s calling him a scumbag, then there’s grandstanding about one’s visceral outrage.
Grandstanding about visceral outrage is pretty much exactly what Alex Jones did.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
@Horace said in Infowars files for bankruptcy protection:
There’s calling him a scumbag, then there’s grandstanding about one’s visceral outrage.
Grandstanding about visceral outrage is pretty much exactly what Alex Jones did.
Yes, that is true. He does that a lot.
-
Probably because,
A. Infowars does not have the footprint or influence of CNN. Except for the MSM ya-ya, the vast majority of Americans would not have heard Jones' opinions on this matter or much of anything else.
B. Infowars, AFAIK, has nowhere near the deep pockets of CNN. The parents will have the satisfaction of bankrupting the company, but other than shutting Jones up on this subject, what did they accomplish? Nutters gotta nut, on either end of the political spectrum. He makes his living off of agitprop.
He will continue to do so.
