Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. For the antibody testers among us

For the antibody testers among us

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
21 Posts 8 Posters 200 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girl
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    For the uneducated here (👉 me!), what numbers are we looking for and why?

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      It’s a measure of Covid antibody levels in your blood. The unit is arbitrary and it’s not totally clear what level is ‘protective’ (insofar as that’s even an intelligible concept) but it’s useful to see where you are on the scale.

      I’ve learned that my antibody titre half life is less than half that of immunocompetent people.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      1 Reply Last reply
      • AxtremusA Offline
        AxtremusA Offline
        Axtremus
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/03/pfizer-moderna-vaccines-spur-slightly-different-antibodies-study-finds/

        It says Pfizer and Moderna vaccines stimulate the body to generate different mixes of antibodies, and that mixing and matching the two as we get boosters is/are good.

        (@Aqua-Letifer, which is grammatical, "mixing and matching is good" or "mixing and matching are good"?)

        Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Axtremus

          https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/03/pfizer-moderna-vaccines-spur-slightly-different-antibodies-study-finds/

          It says Pfizer and Moderna vaccines stimulate the body to generate different mixes of antibodies, and that mixing and matching the two as we get boosters is/are good.

          (@Aqua-Letifer, which is grammatical, "mixing and matching is good" or "mixing and matching are good"?)

          Aqua LetiferA Offline
          Aqua LetiferA Offline
          Aqua Letifer
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          @Axtremus said in For the antibody testers among us:

          https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/03/pfizer-moderna-vaccines-spur-slightly-different-antibodies-study-finds/

          It says Pfizer and Moderna vaccines stimulate the body to generate different mixes of antibodies, and that mixing and matching the two as we get boosters is/are good.

          (@Aqua-Letifer, which is grammatical, "mixing and matching is good" or "mixing and matching are good"?)

          "Are good" in this case.

          Please love yourself.

          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
          • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

            @Axtremus said in For the antibody testers among us:

            https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/03/pfizer-moderna-vaccines-spur-slightly-different-antibodies-study-finds/

            It says Pfizer and Moderna vaccines stimulate the body to generate different mixes of antibodies, and that mixing and matching the two as we get boosters is/are good.

            (@Aqua-Letifer, which is grammatical, "mixing and matching is good" or "mixing and matching are good"?)

            "Are good" in this case.

            George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            @Aqua-Letifer said in For the antibody testers among us:

            (@Aqua-Letifer, which is grammatical, "mixing and matching is good" or "mixing and matching are good"?)

            "Are good" in this case.

            Really? How's that.

            I would think that "mixing and matching" is one concept so singular verb.

            "Putting salt and pepper on an egg is good," eg. Unless "is" is referring to "putting."

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            AxtremusA Aqua LetiferA 2 Replies Last reply
            • George KG George K

              @Aqua-Letifer said in For the antibody testers among us:

              (@Aqua-Letifer, which is grammatical, "mixing and matching is good" or "mixing and matching are good"?)

              "Are good" in this case.

              Really? How's that.

              I would think that "mixing and matching" is one concept so singular verb.

              "Putting salt and pepper on an egg is good," eg. Unless "is" is referring to "putting."

              AxtremusA Offline
              AxtremusA Offline
              Axtremus
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              @George-K said in For the antibody testers among us:

              @Aqua-Letifer said in For the antibody testers among us:

              (@Aqua-Letifer, which is grammatical, "mixing and matching is good" or "mixing and matching are good"?)

              "Are good" in this case.

              @Aqua-Letifer, thanks!

              I would think that "mixing and matching" is one concept so singular verb.

              Confusing, right? “Verb noun agreement” is one those “unnecessary rules” to put in a language’s grammar. It provides minimal redundancy protection for accuracy with way too much complexity.

              "Putting salt and pepper on an egg is good," eg. Unless "is" is referring to "putting."

              Yeah, in this case it’s clear to be that the “is” refers to “putting.”

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Why is it even “mixing and matching”. They’re making the case for mixing, not matching.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  Why is it even “mixing and matching”. They’re making the case for mixing, not matching.

                  AxtremusA Offline
                  AxtremusA Offline
                  Axtremus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  @jon-nyc said in For the antibody testers among us:

                  Why is it even “mixing and matching”. They’re making the case for mixing, not matching.

                  “Matching” is necessary because the “mixing” needs to stay within the confines of “COVID-19 vaccines” to get good COVID-19 protection. (E.g., mixing a Pfizer shot with a Clorox shot is no good.)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG George K

                    @Aqua-Letifer said in For the antibody testers among us:

                    (@Aqua-Letifer, which is grammatical, "mixing and matching is good" or "mixing and matching are good"?)

                    "Are good" in this case.

                    Really? How's that.

                    I would think that "mixing and matching" is one concept so singular verb.

                    "Putting salt and pepper on an egg is good," eg. Unless "is" is referring to "putting."

                    Aqua LetiferA Offline
                    Aqua LetiferA Offline
                    Aqua Letifer
                    wrote on last edited by Aqua Letifer
                    #19

                    @George-K said in For the antibody testers among us:

                    @Aqua-Letifer said in For the antibody testers among us:

                    (@Aqua-Letifer, which is grammatical, "mixing and matching is good" or "mixing and matching are good"?)

                    "Are good" in this case.

                    Really? How's that.

                    I would think that "mixing and matching" is one concept so singular verb.

                    It isn't.

                    Watch yourself mix stuff. Then watch yourself match stuff. Notice the difference. Also note whether one has any dependence on the other.

                    You're getting hung up on the alliterative cliché. Just because it's commonly said together doesn't mean it's one concept. They're two separate concepts that for lazy rhetorical reasons often get said together.

                    Please love yourself.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • HoraceH Offline
                      HoraceH Offline
                      Horace
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Oddly “mixing and matching together” seems to go better with “are good” rather than “is good”. But the “together” should indicate you are treating them as a single system of actions.

                      Education is extremely important.

                      Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Horace

                        Oddly “mixing and matching together” seems to go better with “are good” rather than “is good”. But the “together” should indicate you are treating them as a single system of actions.

                        Aqua LetiferA Offline
                        Aqua LetiferA Offline
                        Aqua Letifer
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        @Horace said in For the antibody testers among us:

                        Oddly “mixing and matching together” seems to go better with “are good” rather than “is good”. But the “together” should indicate you are treating them as a single system of actions.

                        Which you are. But they're still separate actions.

                        Please love yourself.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups