The Ukraine war thread
-
wrote on 27 Jul 2022, 01:52 last edited by
Which is why we need more of our 155mm cannon in country (they outrange the Russian artillery and are more accurate) and we need to beef up Ukraine's air force.p with F-16's and their targeting systems. JDAM bombs are cheap and accurate.
-
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 11:47 last edited by
I believe it's the HIMARS that gave Ukraine this ability to target the bridges.
The bridges are a big deal. Their destruction will make the Russians rely on long, and vulnerable supply lines - remember how that worked out in the North?
-
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 11:52 last edited by
Also a big deal is that the Ukranians have not destroyed all the bridges, but have rendered them unusable for tanks, armored vehicles and heavy trucks.
Unusable also means fixable, when people aren't shooting at you.
-
Also a big deal is that the Ukranians have not destroyed all the bridges, but have rendered them unusable for tanks, armored vehicles and heavy trucks.
Unusable also means fixable, when people aren't shooting at you.
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 12:03 last edited by@Jolly said in The Ukraine war thread:
Also a big deal is that the Ukranians have not destroyed all the bridges, but have rendered them unusable for tanks, armored vehicles and heavy trucks.
How do you make a bridge unusable but not destroy it?
-
@Jolly said in The Ukraine war thread:
Also a big deal is that the Ukranians have not destroyed all the bridges, but have rendered them unusable for tanks, armored vehicles and heavy trucks.
How do you make a bridge unusable but not destroy it?
-
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 12:16 last edited by
-
@Jolly said in The Ukraine war thread:
Also a big deal is that the Ukranians have not destroyed all the bridges, but have rendered them unusable for tanks, armored vehicles and heavy trucks.
How do you make a bridge unusable but not destroy it?
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 12:21 last edited by@Klaus said in The Ukraine war thread:
@Jolly said in The Ukraine war thread:
Also a big deal is that the Ukranians have not destroyed all the bridges, but have rendered them unusable for tanks, armored vehicles and heavy trucks.
How do you make a bridge unusable but not destroy it?
Crater it, punch holes in it, weaken the structure but don't drop it. Think the Ludendorff Bridge in WW2.
-
wrote on 28 Jul 2022, 13:08 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2022, 13:30 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2022, 15:34 last edited by
Jesus.
-
wrote on 31 Jul 2022, 12:55 last edited by
-
wrote on 3 Aug 2022, 14:25 last edited by Mik 8 Mar 2022, 14:26
Take the winning shot, says this military guy. Unfortunately, short of putting US Navy ships in a position to be challenged by the Russian navy, he doesn't say much about how to do this.
-
wrote on 4 Aug 2022, 17:16 last edited by
It is imperative that Ukraine retake and hold Kherson. It will cut off the Russians from taking Odesa and denying the Ukrainians access to the Black Sea. It will also be a political victory since the region is primarily Russian speaking.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 04:35 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 13:48 last edited by Renauda 8 Sept 2022, 13:49
Last week Amnesty International published a report that sparked outrage from Kyiv over Ukrainian troops using civilians and civilian infrastructure as shields and military base points to fight the Russians. Here is a summary of the report and and reaction:
Yesterday, one of my Ukrainian diaspora associates emailed to me this rebuttal to the AI report. I know it’s a blog but it is nevertheless, well presented. If nothing else it shows what the Ukrainian defenders are up against in defending their country from the Russian invaders:
https://thinpinstripedline.blogspot.com/2022/08/we-sleep-safely-in-our-beds-because.html?m=1
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 14:04 last edited by
-
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 17:11 last edited by
-
wrote on 10 Aug 2022, 17:29 last edited by
Been following this since yesterday. There are some indications, albeit unconfirmed, that this may have been Ukrainian partisan action. Given the apparent extent of the attack I have my doubts although the Russian reaction downplaying the results of the attack lend some credence to the partisan claim. If true I wonder if Crimean Tatars were also involved?