A better “invasion” map
-
-
@Klaus said in A better “invasion” map:
His map lies just as much as the one he hates.
If you control the right 1% of a country, you control the country.
How is that map "lying" then? It's not a map of effective control, it's a map of geographic control only.
Please love yourself.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in A better “invasion” map:
@Klaus said in A better “invasion” map:
His map lies just as much as the one he hates.
If you control the right 1% of a country, you control the country.
How is that map "lying" then? It's not a map of effective control, it's a map of geographic control only.
Well, what would a fair map look like?
Obviously the space that is literally occupied by Russian soldiers and vehicles is minimal and wouldn't even be visible on a map.
You need a definition of what "control" means before you can talk about the accuracy of a map.
My first attempt would be something like "Area where Russian soldiers can walk around unarmed, without fear of being shot".
-
@Klaus said in A better “invasion” map:
@Aqua-Letifer said in A better “invasion” map:
@Klaus said in A better “invasion” map:
His map lies just as much as the one he hates.
If you control the right 1% of a country, you control the country.
How is that map "lying" then? It's not a map of effective control, it's a map of geographic control only.
Well, what would a fair map look like?
Obviously the space that is literally occupied by Russian soldiers and vehicles is minimal and wouldn't even be visible on a map.
That's precisely what makes a map like that interesting.
You need a definition of what "control" means before you can talk about the accuracy of a map.
My first attempt would be something like "Area where Russian soldiers can walk around unarmed, without fear of being shot".
Go ahead and try that out then, see how accurate you can be. Bet you $10 it'll be worse than the above.
