To Mask or Not To Mask?
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 15:10 last edited by
I also seem to remember several months ago being told that the virus enters the body thru the mouth, nose and eyes, hence the reason for "don't touch your face".
So... a mask covers 2 out of the 3 entry points. When will it be a requirement to wear a face shield or goggles?
-
Ah... so it really was just bullshit when they said it. Got it.
Kinda like the bullshit guidance George is pointing out at the start of this thread.
wrote on 29 May 2020, 15:11 last edited by@Improviso said in To Mask or Not To Mask?:
Ah... so it really was just bullshit when they said it. Got it.
Kinda like the bullshit guidance George is pointing out at the start of this thread.
I don't think you can make a case that masks don't drastically mitigate the spread of infection from someone who has the virus. To me it sounds like people who don't want to be inconvenienced are reverse-engineering reasons why they think they're ineffective to justify their position. If absolutely everyone in America followed the same guidance, we could open everything up today without any problems.
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 15:13 last edited by
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 15:14 last edited by
They do work, and businesses do not have to be closed. I don't understand the point that meme is trying to make.
-
They do work, and businesses do not have to be closed. I don't understand the point that meme is trying to make.
wrote on 29 May 2020, 15:19 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in To Mask or Not To Mask?:
and businesses do not have to be closed. I don't understand the point that meme is trying to make.
Where you been the last 3 months?
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 15:20 last edited by
Never mind... working from home. Got it.
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 15:26 last edited by
Well if you want to get into this, businesses "have to be closed" because there are enough people out there who think like you do. If everybody wore 'em, there'd be very little risk.
As to work/not work, reality is a little more nuanced than an internet meme you found on Facebook. They're very effective in preventing an infected person from infecting another. And many, many people are completely asymptomatic, so that's very important. Only certain masks effectively prevent you from getting infected from someone else.
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 15:59 last edited by
Is wearing a mask to go to the store really that much of a hardship?
-
Is wearing a mask to go to the store really that much of a hardship?
wrote on 29 May 2020, 16:04 last edited by mark@Doctor-Phibes said in To Mask or Not To Mask?:
Is wearing a mask to go to the store really that much of a hardship?
+1
It's not. But, it has become a rally cry for politics.
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 16:05 last edited by
There are plenty of people enduring real issues, and this is what we're whining about?
Please excuse me while I don't give a fuck.
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 16:07 last edited by
What is the goal? How are we going to measure it?
Exactly how many lives have been saved by masks?
Why would we ever go out without a mask? I mean forever and ever.
Why not wear masks and end all communicable diseases and save everyone's life?
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 16:08 last edited by
@Doctor-Phibes I agree with you. Sorry if I made it sound otherwise.
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 16:14 last edited by xenon
Opposing masks is such an asinine thing to oppose if you're in favor of opening up the country fast.
"Hey guys - let's keep our distance and wear masks and get back out there"
But, no - there's no good grievance in that message. I am genuinely a little surprise how stark the political lines have been drawn on this.
-
wrote on 29 May 2020, 16:17 last edited by
I know how to get people on board with masks.
-
What is the goal? How are we going to measure it?
Exactly how many lives have been saved by masks?
Why would we ever go out without a mask? I mean forever and ever.
Why not wear masks and end all communicable diseases and save everyone's life?
wrote on 29 May 2020, 16:20 last edited by@Copper My goal, is to get past this particular outbreak until such time as proven, effective treatment, that prevents long-term health consequences from this virus, and/or vaccine is available.
I choose to wear a mask. A nice replaceable filter pocket homemade mask that my daughter so lovingly crafted for me. She made one for everyone in our family as well as her friends.
I live in a area not far from Chicago and my particular county has one the fastest growing number of cases in our state.
I will wear one for as long as I want to wear one.
-
@Doctor-Phibes I agree with you. Sorry if I made it sound otherwise.
wrote on 29 May 2020, 16:59 last edited by@mark said in To Mask or Not To Mask?:
@Doctor-Phibes I agree with you. Sorry if I made it sound otherwise.
No, I realised you did. I wasn't being grumpy at you
-
Opposing masks is such an asinine thing to oppose if you're in favor of opening up the country fast.
"Hey guys - let's keep our distance and wear masks and get back out there"
But, no - there's no good grievance in that message. I am genuinely a little surprise how stark the political lines have been drawn on this.
wrote on 29 May 2020, 17:40 last edited by@xenon said in To Mask or Not To Mask?:
Opposing masks is such an asinine thing to oppose if you're in favor of opening up the country fast.
"Hey guys - let's keep our distance and wear masks and get back out there"
But, no - there's no good grievance in that message. I am genuinely a little surprise how stark the political lines have been drawn on this.
It's not the mask
It's the jerks telling people what to do
There are a lot of people who don't like being bossed around by jerks who they know are unable to tell the truth
If Mr. Trump insisted that everyone must wear a mask, cnn would condemn masks, no question
-
@xenon said in To Mask or Not To Mask?:
Opposing masks is such an asinine thing to oppose if you're in favor of opening up the country fast.
"Hey guys - let's keep our distance and wear masks and get back out there"
But, no - there's no good grievance in that message. I am genuinely a little surprise how stark the political lines have been drawn on this.
It's not the mask
It's the jerks telling people what to do
There are a lot of people who don't like being bossed around by jerks who they know are unable to tell the truth
If Mr. Trump insisted that everyone must wear a mask, cnn would condemn masks, no question
wrote on 29 May 2020, 17:42 last edited by@Copper said in To Mask or Not To Mask?:
If Mr. Trump insisted that everyone must wear a mask, cnn would condemn masks, no question
Exactly... you got that right.
-
@xenon said in To Mask or Not To Mask?:
Opposing masks is such an asinine thing to oppose if you're in favor of opening up the country fast.
"Hey guys - let's keep our distance and wear masks and get back out there"
But, no - there's no good grievance in that message. I am genuinely a little surprise how stark the political lines have been drawn on this.
It's not the mask
It's the jerks telling people what to do
There are a lot of people who don't like being bossed around by jerks who they know are unable to tell the truth
If Mr. Trump insisted that everyone must wear a mask, cnn would condemn masks, no question
wrote on 29 May 2020, 17:49 last edited by@Copper said in To Mask or Not To Mask?:
It's the jerks telling people what to do
And the jerks requiring it don't heed it themselves. No mask. No social distancing. Just an Executive order telling EVERYBODY else to do it..
