Keep Pounding
-
-
@jolly said in Keep Pounding:
It’s time for RINOs to step forward and save our Country!
Now he pins his hope on RINOs.
-
What's really sad is people believing this shit.
Obviously, he's a con-artist, he has been his whole life, but people actually buy into his crap, even though it's so ludicrous.
Sorry, I forgot. Greatest President Since Lincoln!
Proud supporter of Plan 2525. Everything you think, do and say will be in the pill you took today.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Keep Pounding:
What's really sad is people believing this shit.
Obviously, he's a con-artist, he has been his whole life, but people actually buy into his crap, even though it's so ludicrous.
Sorry, I forgot. Greatest President Since Lincoln!
What's really sad is that after watching the democrats' crass attempts to trash supreme court nominees, after watching Hillary's stunts, after watching democrats try to rig the election process, and at a time when the current Resident is fucking the nation over both intentionally and out of inept stupidity, at a time when your very freedoms and the republic so much blood, sweat, and tears went into to build and the democrats are throwing it all out the window....
Some of you are STILL obsessed with Trump.
That "con artist" did a great job. Make yourself useful and help figure out how to undo the damage being done by the current con artist,
Jesus H. Christ.
-
@klaus said in Keep Pounding:
Where's the evidence? Without hard evidence, this is just drivel.
It's taken what?... 5 years (and counting) to unwind the Hillary "Trump's a Russian asset" hoax.
Give it time.
They laughed when Trump said he was being spied on. Turns out, he was right.
-
Other than the statement issued but President Trump, the only "news" sites that seem to report on this are "Sputnik New" and "Conserative World.org"
As one commentator summed up"
"This is not evidence of fraud. This is an accusation that Wisconsin's voter databases are messy and inefficient.
Did you watch the presentation? I did until about minute 38. He repeatedly claims so-and-so voted illegally. But, we only have his word for it. He never shows a cast ballot linked to a dead voter, or a 99999 zip code voter, or a 1918 voter, etc. He claims high numbers of voters are registered at the same address. He provided no supportive data such as names and registrations. Again, we have to take his word for it. He shows individuals with multiple voter ID numbers but, in each case, only one of those numbers was shown as "active". He does not offer any proof that those individuals voted more than once each. He says, more than once, that some "random bad guy" could hack into the system and easily switch registrations from "inactive" to "active". There is a lot of time and space and evidence needed to conclusively link "could" and "did". He only makes an allegation.
His only evidence in his presentation is his own spreadsheet. Yet, he questions chain-of-custody processes."
