Demonetized

[Jolly]

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/01/07/uahs-earth-system-science-center-records-considered-unreliable-and-harmful-by-google/

[Copper]

I was kind of hoping my content was mainstream enough to avoid being banned since:

1. I believe the climate system has warmed

2. I believe most of this warming is probably due to greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel burning

Lucky for him, he knows the right thing to say to achieve a good virtue score

[Copper]

But this, definitely is not the approved science


[Mik]

Censorship just keeps growing.

[Horace]

I can’t expect their liberal arts-educated “fact checkers” to understand the nuances of the global warming debate.

Shots fired!

[Horace]

If you read "demonetized" as "demonized" it actually has the same meaning.

[Axtremus]

@mik said in Demonetized:

Censorship just keeps growing.

There is no censorship in this case. No one is taking down contents. Just one private entity not wanting to let another private entity earn advertising money using its platform anymore.

[Larry]

@axtremus said in Demonetized:

@mik said in Demonetized:

Censorship just keeps growing.

There is no census in this case. No one is taking down contents. Just one private entity not wanting to let another private entity earn advertising money using its platform anymore.

You ARE, without any doubt, a fool.

[Axtremus]

The headline is also misleading. It namecheck "UAH’s Earth System Science Center Records ..." to make hay. Those records have been gathered using public funds and the records are public domain. There is no rule that says one private entity has to let another private entity "monetize" public domain information. What the authors have been monetizing are their opinions that make use of these public domain records. There is no rule that says one private entity had to let another private entity monetize its opinions, too.

[Jolly]

Yes, we just need to build another Google.

Get right on that, willya?